Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33715583›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychological rehabilitation2022

Training flexible conceptual retrieval in post-stroke aphasia.

Sara Stampacchia, Glyn P Hallam, Hannah E Thompson, Upasana Nathaniel, Lucilla Lanzoni, Jonathan Smallwood, Matthew A Lambon Ralph, Elizabeth Jefferies

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Sara StampacchiaDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, UK.
Glyn P HallamDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8956-9054
Hannah E ThompsonSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0679-1961
Upasana NathanielDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, UK.
Lucilla LanzoniDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, UK.
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, UK.
Matthew A Lambon RalphCognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Elizabeth JefferiesDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3826-4330
University of York · GBMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBQueen's University · CAUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Huddersfield · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/18Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/9Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semantic therapy in post-stroke aphasia typically focusses on strengthening links between conceptual representations and their lexical-articulatory forms to aid word retrieval. However, research has shown that semantic deficits in this group can affect both verbal and non-verbal tasks, particularly in patients with deregulated retrieval as opposed to degraded knowledge. This study, therefore, aimed to facilitate semantic cognition in a sample of such patients with post-stroke semantic aphasia (SA) by training the identification of both strong and weak semantic associations and providing explicit pictorial feedback that demonstrated both common and more unusual ways of linking concepts together. We assessed the effects of this training on (i) trained and untrained items; and (ii) trained and untrained tasks in eleven individuals with SA. In the training task, the SA group showed improvement with practice, particularly for trained items. A similar untrained task using pictorial stimuli (Camel and Cactus Test) also improved. Together, these results suggest that semantic training can be beneficial in patients with SA and may show some degree of generalization to untrained situations. Future research should seek to understand which patients are most likely to benefit from this type of training.

Indexed as

AphasiaCognition DisordersCognitionHumansNeuropsychological TestsSemanticsAphasiacognitive controlexecutivesemantictraining

Identifiers

PMID33715583
PMCPMC7614451
OpenAlexW3136865093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.