ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2021
Teledermatology in times of COVID-19.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Teledermatology versus Face-to-Face Dermatology: An Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness from Eight Studies from Europe and the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Bridging the gap through telemedicine: Pilot study on the acceptance and use of teledermatology for urticaria.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Article
- Digital Health for Breast Care: Patient Satisfaction and Reducing Disparities through Telemedicine.International journal of breast cancer · 2025Article
- The Past, the Present and the Future of Teledermatology: A Narrative Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Review
- Teledermatological Follow-Up Consultations in Individual Prevention of Occupational Dermatoses: A Monocentric Feasibility Study on Quality and Satisfaction by Patients and Physicians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Teledermatology for Common Inflammatory Skin Conditions: The Medicine of the Future?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Investigating Patients' Continuance Intention Toward Conversational Agents in Outpatient Departments: Cross-sectional Field Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis of Quality of Life of Patients with Dermatological Problems: Teledermatology Versus Face-to-Face Dermatology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Teledermatology to Facilitate Patient Care Transitions From Inpatient to Outpatient Dermatology: Mixed Methods Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Telemedicine Use by Oculoplastic Surgeons During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2022Article
- Teledermatology in the time of COVID-19.International journal of clinical practice · 2021Review
- Using Implementation Science to Understand Teledermatology Implementation Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Remote consultations are likely to grow in importance in the following years, especially if the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues. Patients' opinions on teledermatology have already been analyzed, but a current analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic is lacking. The purpose of this survey was to investigate the satisfaction of patients who had received dermatological advice via telephone during the COVID-19 pandemic and to analyze their general opinion about eHealth as well as possible limitations for a broad implementation. Ninety-one patients managed in the dermatology department using telephone consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic were interviewed. An anonymous questionnaire, including the established quality of life questionnaire (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), was used. It was found that men were more satisfied with telephone consultations than women (p = 0.029), educational level and age did not correlate with satisfaction (p = 0.186 and 388, respectively), and the longer the waiting time for a telephone consultation, the lower the satisfaction (p = 0.001). Grouped analysis of all participants showed that the majority (54.0% n = 38/71) were "very happy" with the telephone consultation. Higher disease burden (DLQI) was associated with lower satisfaction (p = 0.042). The main stated reasons for using telemedicine were shorter waiting times (51.6% n = 47/91) and no travel requirement (57.1% n = 47/91). Almost one-quarter (23.1% n = 21/89) of patients would use teledermatology in the future, 17.6% (n = 16/89) would not, and 57.1% (n = 51/89) would only use it in addition to a traditional consultation with personal contact. In conclusion, most patients in the study group still preferred traditional face-to-face medical consultations to telephone consultations, but also desired an add-on telemedical tool. Dermatological care using more modern telemedicine technologies than telephone conferencing is needed to better address patients' desires, especially in times of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.