Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33715097›Full record

ReviewAmbio2021

Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere.

Carl Folke, Stephen Polasky, Johan Rockström, Victor Galaz, Frances Westley, Michèle Lamont, Marten Scheffer, Henrik Österblom, Stephen R Carpenter, F Stuart Chapin and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ambio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Housing inequality and settlement persistence are associated across the archaeological record.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. The place for people in rewilding.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Carl FolkeBeijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden. carl.folke@beijer.kva.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4050-3281
Stephen PolaskyUniversity of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Johan RockströmPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany.
Victor GalazStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Frances WestleyUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Michèle LamontHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Marten SchefferWageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Henrik ÖsterblomStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stephen R CarpenterUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
F Stuart ChapinUniversity of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK, USA.
Karen C SetoYale University, New Haven, USA.
Elke U WeberPrinceton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Beatrice I CronaGlobal Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere Programme (GEDB), Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gretchen C DailyStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Partha DasguptaUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Owen GaffneyPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany.
Line J GordonStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Holger HoffPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany.
Simon A LevinPrinceton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Jane LubchencoOregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Will SteffenAustralian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Brian H WalkerCSIRO, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed an interconnected and tightly coupled globalized world in rapid change. This article sets the scientific stage for understanding and responding to such change for global sustainability and resilient societies. We provide a systemic overview of the current situation where people and nature are dynamically intertwined and embedded in the biosphere, placing shocks and extreme events as part of this dynamic; humanity has become the major force in shaping the future of the Earth system as a whole; and the scale and pace of the human dimension have caused climate change, rapid loss of biodiversity, growing inequalities, and loss of resilience to deal with uncertainty and surprise. Taken together, human actions are challenging the biosphere foundation for a prosperous development of civilizations. The Anthropocene reality-of rising system-wide turbulence-calls for transformative change towards sustainable futures. Emerging technologies, social innovations, broader shifts in cultural repertoires, as well as a diverse portfolio of active stewardship of human actions in support of a resilient biosphere are highlighted as essential parts of such transformations.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsBiodiversityClimate ChangeHumansSARS-CoV-2AnthropoceneBiodiversityBiosphere stewardshipClimateResilienceSocial-ecological

Identifiers

PMID33715097
PMCPMC7955950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.