Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33715095›Full record

ArticleAmbio2022

Solutions-oriented research for sustainability: Turning knowledge into action : This article belongs to Ambio's 50th Anniversary Collection. Theme: Solutions-oriented research.

Maria Tengö, Erik Andersson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Maria TengöStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden. maria.tengo@su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4776-3748
Erik AnderssonStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm Resilience Centre · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this perspective, we reflect upon the question: what processes may help transition scientific insights on sustainability issues into practice and thus contribute to tackling the complex, systemic sustainability problems of today? We use five forerunners in the field of providing and brokering knowledge for science informed real world solutions, all published in Ambio and highlighted in this Anniversary collection, as our starting point. We discuss how the authors present solutions, whom they tried to reach, and what was suggested-implicitly or explicitly-as the potential uptake processes for turning scientific knowledge into practice. With this as the starting point, we discuss how sustainability science, as a field vowed to action, has evolved in its views of actors, pathways for impacts, and the potential roles of research and researchers to promote sustainability transformations.

Indexed as

Anniversaries and Special EventsKnowledgeCo-production of knowledgePolicy entrepreneurshipSolutions-oriented researchSustainability scienceTransdisciplinarityUsable knowledge

Identifiers

PMID33715095
PMCPMC8651961
OpenAlexW3137502114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.