Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33715090›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

[

Alessio Annovazzi, Virginia Ferraresi, Vincenzo Anelli, Renato Covello, Sabrina Vari, Carmine Zoccali, Roberto Biagini, Rosa Sciuto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Correlation betweenQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Impact of PET/CT on Paediatric Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Head-to-head evaluation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  14. Clinical Perspectives forMetabolites · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessio AnnovazziNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 00144, Rome, Italy. alessio.annovazzi@ifo.gov.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4887-7982
Virginia FerraresiFirst Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo AnelliRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging Unit, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Renato CovelloDepartment of Pathology, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Sabrina VariFirst Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Carmine ZoccaliOncological Orthopaedics Unit, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Roberto BiaginiOncological Orthopaedics Unit, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Rosa SciutoNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITNational Cancer Institute · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe application of [

methodsTwenty-eight patients with non-metastatic EWS of bone (n = 20) and soft tissues (n = 8) who underwent a [

resultsΔTLG (cut-off: -60%) is the best predictor for histologic response with 100% sensitivity and 77.8% specificity. MTV

conclusions[ KEY POINTS: • The variation of the PET parameter tumour lesion glycolysis (TLG) can predict the histologic response to induction chemotherapy (sensitivity 100%, specificity 77.8%), in patients with Ewing sarcoma. • The percentage variation of TLG and the value of the SUVmax at PET scan after chemotherapy show a prognostic role for future disease relapse. The combination of both the parameters identifies three prognostic classes of patients with low, intermediate and high risk of disease relapse.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Sarcoma, EwingGlycolysisHumansInduction ChemotherapyPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesTumor BurdenFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsEwing sarcomaFluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucoseInduction chemotherapyPatient outcome assessmentPET/CT scan

Identifiers

PMID33715090
OpenAlexW3137795081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.