ArticlePlanta2021
Rhizosphere microorganisms enhance in vitro root and plantlet development of Pyrus and Prunus rootstocks.
Article in Planta, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Omics Integration Reveals Temporal Partitioning Between Metabolic Priming and Proliferative Expansion in PGPR-Treated Cherry Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Identification, pathogenicity, and virulence of the causal agent of bacterial scab disease on mango in China.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Recent advances in the use of plant growth promoting microorganisms for enhancing micropropagation efficiency.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Development of a Feasible and Efficient In Vitro Rescue Protocol for ImmaturePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of cell death-inducing activity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Evaluation of functional plant growth-promoting activities of culturable rhizobacteria associated to tunicate maize (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of the rhizosphere microbiome and medicinally active ingredients ofOpen life sciences · 2023Article
- Non-volatile signals and redox mechanisms are required for the responses of Arabidopsis roots to Pseudomonas oryzihabitans.Journal of experimental botany · 2022Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of the structure and function of rhizosphere microbiome of the Chinese medicinal herb Alisma in different regions.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Using plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) to improve plant development under in vitro culture conditions.Planta · 2022Review
- Effects of Auxin (Indole-3-butyric Acid) on Adventitious Root Formation in Peach-BasedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Optimization of a food industry-waste-based medium for the production of the plant growth promoting microorganismBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Plant Growth Promotion by Two Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted From the FungusFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionThe in vitro application of rhizosphere microorganisms led to a higher rooting percentage in Pyrus Py12 rootstocks and increased plant growth of Pyrus Py170 and Prunus RP-20. The rooting of fruit tree rootstocks is the most challenging step of the in vitro propagation process. The use of rhizosphere microorganisms to promote in vitro rooting and plant growth as an alternative to the addition of chemical hormones to culture media is proposed in the present study. Explants from two Pyrus (Py170 and Py12) rootstocks and the Prunus RP-20 rootstock were inoculated with Pseudomonas oryzihabitans PGP01, Cladosporium ramotenellum PGP02 and Phoma sp. PGP03 following two different methods to determine their effects on in vitro rooting and plantlet growth. The effects of the microorganisms on the growth of fully developed Py170 and RP-20 plantlets were also studied in vitro. All experiments were conducted using vermiculite to simulate a soil system in vitro. When applied to Py12 shoots, which is a hard-to-root plant material, both C. ramotenellum PGP02 and Phoma sp. PGP03 fungi were able to increase the rooting percentage from 56.25% to 100% following auxin indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) treatment. Thus, the presence of these microorganisms clearly improved root development, inducing a higher number of roots and causing shorter roots. Better overall growth and improved stem growth of treated plants was observed when auxin treatment was replaced by co-culture with microorganisms. A root growth-promoting effect was observed on RP-20 plantlets after inoculation with C. ramotenellum PGP02, while P. oryzihabitans PGP01 increased root numbers for both Py170 and RP-20 and increased root growth over stem growth for RP-20. It was also shown that the three microorganisms P. oryzihabitans PGP01, C. ramotenellum PGP02 and Phoma sp. PGP03 were able to naturally produce auxin, including indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), at different levels. Overall, our results demonstrate that the microorganisms P. oryzihabitans PGP01 and C. ramotenellum PGP02 had beneficial effects on in vitro rooting and plantlet growth and could be applied to in vitro tissue culture as a substitute for IBA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33715081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.