Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33715063›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2021

Computer-assisted open reduction internal fixation of intraarticular radius fractures navigated with patient-specific instrumentation, a prospective case series.

F A Casari, S Roner, P Fürnstahl, L Nagy, A Schweizer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F A CasariOrthopedic Department, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich-CH, Switzerland. fabio.casari@balgrist.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9530-4861
S RonerOrthopedic Department, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich-CH, Switzerland.
P FürnstahlROCS; Research in Orthopedic Computer Science, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Balgrist-Campus, Lengghalde 5, 8008, Zurich-CH, Switzerland.
L NagyOrthopedic Department, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich-CH, Switzerland.
A SchweizerOrthopedic Department, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich-CH, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra-articular fractures are associated with posttraumatic arthritis if inappropriately treated. Exact reduction of the joint congruency is the main factor to avoid the development of arthrosis. Aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of computer-assisted surgical planning and 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for treatment of distal intraarticular radius fractures.

method7 Patients who suffered a distal intraarticular radius fracture were enrolled in this prospective case series. Preoperative CT-scan was recorded, whereupon a 3D model was computed for surgical planning and design of PSI for surgical navigation. Postoperative accuracy and joint congruency were assessed. Patients were followed-up 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

resultsMean follow-up was 16 months. Over all range of motion was restored and flexion, extension and pronation showed significant recovery, p < 0.05. Biggest intraarticular joint step-off and gap reduced from average 2.49 (± 1.04) to 0.8 mm (± 0.44), p < 0.05 and 6.12 mm (± 1.04) to 2.21 mm (± 1.16), p < 0.05. Average grip strength restored (3-16 months) from 20.33 kg (± 7.12) to 39.3 kg (± 19.55) p < 0.05, 100% of the healthy contralateral side. 3D-accuracy for guided fragments was 2.07 mm (± 0.64) and 8.59° (± 2.9) and 2.33 mm (± 0.69) and 12.86° (± 7.13), p > 0.05 for fragments reduced with ligamentotaxis.

conclusionComputer-assisted and PSI navigated intraarticular radius fracture treatment is feasible, safe and accurate. The benefits of this method, however, do not outstand the additional effort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Intra-Articular FracturesRadius FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedBone PlatesComputersFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularSurgery, Computer-AssistedTreatment Outcome3D printingComputer-assisted surgeryIntra-articular radius fracturePatient-specific instrumentPSI

Identifiers

PMID33715063
PMCPMC8295140
OpenAlexW3138221569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.