Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33715050›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Abdominal vessel depiction on virtual triphasic spectral detector CT: initial clinical experience.

Simon Lennartz, Kai Roman Laukamp, Yasmeen Tandon, Michelle Jordan, Nils Große Hokamp, David Zopfs, Lenhard Pennig, Markus Obmann, Robert C Gilkeson, Karin A Herrmann and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Simon Lennartz *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Kerpener Straße, 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Kai Roman Laukamp *Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. kai.laukamp@uk-koeln.de.
Yasmeen TandonDepartment of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Michelle JordanDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Nils Große HokampDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
David ZopfsDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Kerpener Straße, 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Lenhard PennigDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Kerpener Straße, 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Markus ObmannDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Robert C GilkesonDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Karin A HerrmannDepartment of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Nikhil RamaiyaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Amit GuptaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
University Hospitals of Cleveland · USCase Western Reserve University · USUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate vessel assessment in virtual monoenergetic images (VMI

methodsTriphasic abdominal SDCT was performed in 25 patients including TNC, arterial and venous phase. VMI

resultsQuantitative analysis revealed no significant attenuation differences between TNC and VNC in arterial vessels (p-range 0.07-0.47) except for the renal artery (p = 0.011). For venous vessels, significant differences between TNC and VNC were found for all veins (p < 0.001) except the inferior vena cava (p = 0.26), yet these differences remained within a 10 HU range in most patients. No significant attenuation differences were found between CI

conclusionOur study suggests that VNC and VMI

Indexed as

AbdomenTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansRenal ArteryRetrospective StudiesMultiphase CTSpectral-detector CTVirtual monoenergetic imagesVirtual non-contrast images

Identifiers

PMID33715050
PMCPMC8215039
OpenAlexW3139206069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.