Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33715033›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Prospective comparison of

Simona Malaspina, Mikael Anttinen, Pekka Taimen, Ivan Jambor, Minna Sandell, Irina Rinta-Kiikka, Sami Kajander, Jukka Schildt, Ekaterina Saukko, Tommi Noponen and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03537391 (Imaging for Prostate Cancer Metastasis Detection - Traditional Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03537391 nacompletednot on this map

Imaging for Prostate Cancer Metastasis Detection - Traditional Imaging (Bone Scan and CT) Versus PSMA-PET-CT, SPECT-CT and Whole-Body MRI

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan2018 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsHigh Risk Prostate CancerArmsWhole body contrast enhanced computer tomography, 99mTC-HMDP planar bone scintigraphy (BS), 99mTc-HMDP single photon emission computer tomography/computer tomography, Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging, Fluorine-18-prostate specific membrane antigen-1007- positron emission tomography/computer tomography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prospective comparison ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Diagnostic impact of interpretation criteria for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. International journal of clinical oncology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparative Performance ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. [Research progress on prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography imaging of prostate cancer].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Simona MalaspinaTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. simona.malaspina@tyks.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2701-8978
Mikael AnttinenDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Pekka TaimenInstitute of Biomedicine and Department of Pathology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Ivan JamborDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Minna SandellDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Irina Rinta-KiikkaDepartment of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Sami KajanderTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jukka SchildtDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ekaterina SaukkoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Tommi NoponenDepartment of Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jani SaunavaaraDepartment of Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Peter B DeanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Roberto Blanco SequeirosDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Hannu J AronenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jukka KemppainenTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Marko SeppänenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Peter J BoströmDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Otto EttalaDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
University of Turku · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FITampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo prospectively compare

methodsMen with newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate- or high-risk PCa prospectively underwent

resultsSeventy-nine patients completed all the imaging modalities, except for one case of interrupted WBMRI. Thirty-one (39%) patients had pelvic lymph node metastases, which were detected in 27/31 (87%), 14/31 (45%) and 8/31 (26%) patients by

conclusionCLINICAL

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03537391.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm StagingNiacinamideOligopeptidesProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedWhole Body ImagingNiacinamideOligopeptidesPSMA-100718F-PSMA-1007 PET/CTCTLymph node metastasisPrimary stagingProstate cancerWBMRI

Identifiers

PMID33715033
PMCPMC8263440
OpenAlexW3138148187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.