ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021
Prognostic models for 1-year survival of NPC after radiotherapy in different ages.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two web-based dynamically interactive nomograms and risk stratification systems for predicting survival outcomes and guiding treatment in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Trial
- The current role of immunotherapy in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma survival by histology in endemic and non-endemic areas.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrevious studies have shown that approximately 10% of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients die within a year of disease onset, and that age is an independent predictor. However, no predictive model has been developed. We aimed to establish novel prognostic models to predict the 1-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) of young, middle-aged, and older patients with NPC after radiotherapy.
methodsThe data of 2822 NPC patients who underwent radiotherapy between 2004 and 2015 were reviewed from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. We divided them into young, middle-aged, and older people groups according to age (< 44 years, 45-59 years, and ≥ 60 years, respectively). Multivariate analyses were performed, and prognostic models were constructed.
resultsMultivariate analyses indicated that age, ethnicity, histological subtype, T, and M stage were independent predictors of 1-year CSS in the older people group. In contrast, ethnicity and age were not found to have predictive value in the young and middle-aged groups, respectively. Accordingly, three prognostic models with excellent predictive values were established for the three groups (C-indices: 0.791 [95% CI 0.722-0.859], 0.763 [95% CI 0.721-0.806] and 0.723 [95% CI 0.683-0.763], respectively). These predictive values are higher than those of the eighth edition American joint committee cancer tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system.
conclusionThree prognostic models for predicting the 1-year CSS of young, middle-aged, and older NPC patients after radiotherapy showed better predictive power than the TNM classification system. These models may guide treatment strategies and clinical decision-making in different cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.