Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33715004›Full record

ArticleBJS open2021

Expanded criteria for pretreatment staging CT in breast cancer.

N Roszkowski, S S Lam, E Copson, R I Cutress, R Oeppen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

N RoszkowskiBreast Imaging Unit, Princess Anne Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
S S LamBreast Imaging Unit, Princess Anne Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
E CopsonCancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
R I CutressCancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
R OeppenBreast Imaging Unit, Princess Anne Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is wide variation in the approach to staging for distant metastatic disease in breast cancer. This study sought to identify factors predictive of distant metastatic disease at presentation to enable appropriate selection of patients for pretreatment CT.

methodsData were collected retrospectively for all patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer (screening and symptomatic) over 3 years (2014-2017). Detailed demographic, pathological, biological, and management data were recorded at presentation, and outcome data were recorded after follow-up. Binomial logistic regression was used to identify variables independently associated with distant metastatic disease at presentation.

resultsA total of 1377 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were identified, of whom 1025 had complete data; 323 staging CT examinations were performed. Distant metastases were identified at presentation in 47 (4.6 per cent). Some 30 of 47 patients with metastatic disease met established criteria for staging (T4, recurrence, symptoms of possible distant metastases), leaving 17 patients with metastatic disease potentially missed by use of these criteria alone. Multivariable analysis showed that tumour size at least 3 cm combined with sonographically abnormal axillary lymph nodes predicted a high probability of distant metastatic disease at presentation (positive predictive value 18.8 per cent, odds ratio 4.83, P < 0.001). Addition of this criterion increased the positive CT rate to 17.1 per cent.

conclusionSelective pretreatment CT staging can be further optimized with the addition of tumour size at least 3 cm with abnormal axillary nodes to established staging criteria.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAxillaBiopsy, NeedleBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33715004
PMCPMC7955978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.