Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33714840›Full record

Observational studySeizure2021

Machine learning models to predict electroencephalographic seizures in critically ill children.

Jian Hu, France W Fung, Marin Jacobwitz, Darshana S Parikh, Lisa Vala, Maureen Donnelly, Alexis A Topjian, Nicholas S Abend, Rui Xiao

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Seizure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Late-Onset Findings During Extended EEG Monitoring Are Rare in Critically Ill Children.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jian HuDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, United States.
France W FungDepartment of Pediatrics (Division of Neurology), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, United States.
Marin JacobwitzDepartment of Pediatrics (Division of Neurology), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States.
Darshana S ParikhDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States; Department of Neurodiagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States.
Lisa ValaDepartment of Neurodiagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States.
Maureen DonnellyDepartment of Neurodiagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States.
Alexis A TopjianDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States; Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, United States.
Nicholas S AbendDepartment of Pediatrics (Division of Neurology), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, United States; Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, United States; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, United States; Department of Neurodiagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States.
Rui XiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, United States; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: xiaor@email.chop.edu.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

The Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC) at CHOP/PennP50HD105354 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ERIC D MARSH, ROBERT Thomas SCHULTZ · 2021 to 2026
$9.2M
The Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at CHOP/PennU54HD086984 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI SCHULTZ, ROBERT THOMAS · 2016 to 2020
$6.3M
Electrographic seizure management and neurobehavioral outcomes in critically ill children.K02NS096058 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ABEND, NICHOLAS SCOTT · 2017 to 2019
$579k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105354NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD086984NINDS NIH HHS K02 NS096058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether machine learning techniques would enhance our ability to incorporate key variables into a parsimonious model with optimized prediction performance for electroencephalographic seizure (ES) prediction in critically ill children.

methodsWe analyzed data from a prospective observational cohort study of 719 consecutive critically ill children with encephalopathy who underwent clinically-indicated continuous EEG monitoring (CEEG). We implemented and compared three state-of-the-art machine learning methods for ES prediction: (1) random forest; (2) Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO); and (3) Deep Learning Important FeaTures (DeepLIFT). We developed a ranking algorithm based on the relative importance of each variable derived from the machine learning methods.

resultsBased on our ranking algorithm, the top five variables for ES prediction were: (1) epileptiform discharges in the initial 30 minutes, (2) clinical seizures prior to CEEG initiation, (3) sex, (4) age dichotomized at 1 year, and (5) epileptic encephalopathy. Compared to the stepwise selection-based approach in logistic regression, the top variables selected by our ranking algorithm were more informative as models utilizing the top variables achieved better prediction performance evaluated by prediction accuracy, AUROC and F1 score. Adding additional variables did not improve and sometimes worsened model performance.

conclusionThe ranking algorithm was helpful in deriving a parsimonious model for ES prediction with optimal performance. However, application of state-of-the-art machine learning models did not substantially improve model performance compared to prior logistic regression models. Thus, to further improve the ES prediction, we may need to collect more samples and variables that provide additional information.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessSeizuresChildElectroencephalographyHumansMachine LearningProspective StudiesEEG monitoringElectroencephalogramMachine learningPediatricSeizure

Identifiers

PMID33714840
PMCPMC8044039
OpenAlexW3135770763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.