Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33714263›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2021

Acceptability and safety of the menstrual cups among Iranian women: a cross-sectional study.

Maryam Gharacheh, Fahimeh Ranjbar, Negar Hajinasab, Shima Haghani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07137663 (Investigation of the Use of Menstrual Cups in the Menstrual Health and Hygiene Management of Women Using Wheelchairs), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07137663 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of the Use of Menstrual Cups in the Menstrual Health and Hygiene Management of Women Using Wheelchairs

TypeinterventionalSponsorHülya ULAŞLI KABANRan2025 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsMenstrual Cup, Menstrual Hygiene Management, Disabled PeopleArmsEducational and practical intervention on menstrual cup use
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The necessity of enhancing menstrual health policy in Iran: A letter to editor.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Understanding and Perception of the Menstrual Cup Among Medical Students.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Concerns and Willingness to Use Menstrual Cup Among Healthcare Personnel: A Mixed-Method Study From Tertiary Care Institute in North India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
  15. Menstrual Cup use among Nulliparous Women: Breaking Taboos and Empowering Communities - A Scoping Review.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maryam GharachehNursing Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fahimeh RanjbarNursing Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ranjbar.f@iums.ac.ir.
Negar HajinasabStudent Research Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shima HaghaniNursing Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iranshahr University · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMenstrual cup is one of the menstrual management products that is available throughout the world and can be effective in improving women's quality of life by empowering women in menstrual management. Although menstrual cups have recently entered the Iranian market, the use of this product is limited among women. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability and safety of menstrual cups among Iranian women.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study conducted in 2020. Iranian women between the ages of 18 and 50 with regular menstrual periods who used the menstrual cup at least for three months were included. Participants were selected through continuous sampling, and they completed a web-based questionnaire including a demographic characteristics form as well as checklists on acceptability and safety through a link sent electronically via social media.

resultsThe mean score of the overall satisfaction with the cup was 6.54 ± 0.76, and the leakage had the lowest mean score among the satisfaction items (5.25 ± 1.63). About 83% of participants reported experiencing menstrual cup leakage. Among the reported health risks, the highest mean score was for vaginal pain during removal (23.9%). Most participants (83.9%) were familiar with the cup via social networks and 98.6% recommended this product to other women.

conclusionsThe high level of acceptability and safety of the menstrual cup showed that this product is a suitable alternative for menstrual management in Iranian women. The results of the study help healthcare providers to learn more about the potential advantages and disadvantages of using cup and create trust in the menstrual cup use based on the results of local evidence-based research.

Indexed as

Menstrual Hygiene ProductsQuality of LifeChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantIranMenstruationIranMenstrual cupMenstrual hygieneMenstrual managementMenstruation

Identifiers

PMID33714263
PMCPMC7955610
OpenAlexW3138468551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.