ReviewClinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry2021
Recommendations on the measurement and the clinical use of vitamin D metabolites and vitamin D binding protein - A position paper from the IFCC Committee on bone metabolism.
Review in Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using a Topical Formulation of Vitamin D for the Treatment of Vitiligo: A Systematic Review.Cells · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Status Across Vertebrate Species: A Comparative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Dietary Patterns, Micronutrient Adequacy, and Metabolic Vulnerability in Alzheimer's Disease: A Critical Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Advances in the measurement of vitamin D binding protein.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Article
- Comparison of LC-MS/MS and CLIA Methods for Vitamin D Measurement in an Unselected Outpatient Cohort: Statistical Evaluation and Impact on Clinical Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Reclassification of Vitamin D Status Across Three Automated Immunoassays After Comparability Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among school-age children in Tunisia: a first national cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The relationship between smoking cessation and vitamin D.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Unveiling the complexities of hypoparathyroidism: a comprehensive review of clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and novel therapies.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Review
- Genetic determinants of response to vitamin D supplementation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Associations of endocrine disrupting chemical biomarkers and their mixture with vitamin D biomarker concentrations in childhood: The HOME Study.Environmental research · 2026Article
- Exploring Vitamin D Trends Through Big Data Analysis.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Measurement of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in serum by LC-MS/MS compared to immunoassay reveals inconsistent agreement in paediatric samples.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- HDL-associated vitamin D binding protein levels are inversely associated with necrotic plaque burden in psoriasis.Atherosclerosis plus · 2025Article
- Association of low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with hearing loss severity in Meniere disease: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Biochemical evaluation of X-linked hypophosphatemia and tumor-induced osteomalacia: insights into diagnosis and management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Vitamin D Controversies in the Laboratory Medicine: A Review of Clinical Guidelines and Recommendations.EJIFCC · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Vitamin D, an important hormone with a central role in calcium and phosphate homeostasis, is required for bone and muscle development as well as preservation of musculoskeletal function. The most abundant vitamin D metabolite is 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], which is currently considered the best marker to evaluate overall vitamin D status. 25(OH)D is therefore the most commonly measured metabolite in clinical practice. However, several other metabolites, although not broadly measured, are useful in certain clinical situations. Vitamin D and all its metabolites are circulating in blood bound to vitamin D binding protein, (VDBP). This highly polymorphic protein is not only the major transport protein which, along with albumin, binds over 99% of the circulating vitamin D metabolites, but also participates in the transport of the 25(OH)D into the cell via a megalin/cubilin complex. The accurate measurement of 25(OH)D has proved a difficult task. Although a reference method and standardization program are available for 25(OH)D, the other vitamin D metabolites still lack this. Interpretation of results, creation of clinical supplementation, and generation of therapeutic guidelines require not only accurate measurements of vitamin D metabolites, but also the accurate measurements of several other "molecules" related with bone metabolism. IFCC understood this priority and a committee has been established with the task to support and continue the standardization processes of vitamin D metabolites along with other bone-related biomarkers. In this review, we present the position of this IFCC Committee on Bone Metabolism on the latest developments concerning the measurement and standardization of vitamin D metabolites and its binding protein, as well as clinical indications for their measurement and interpretation of the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.