Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33713594›Full record

ArticleCell reports2021

The effect of spike mutations on SARS-CoV-2 neutralization.

Chloe Rees-Spear, Luke Muir, Sarah A Griffith, Judith Heaney, Yoann Aldon, Jonne L Snitselaar, Peter Thomas, Carl Graham, Jeffrey Seow, Nayung Lee and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 170 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. COVID-19 mutations: An overview.World journal of methodology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Chloe Rees-SpearInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Luke MuirInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Sarah A GriffithInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Judith HeaneyAdvanced Pathogens Diagnostic Unit, Department of Clinical Virology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London W1T 4EU, UK.
Yoann AldonAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jonne L SnitselaarAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter ThomasInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Carl GrahamSchool of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Jeffrey SeowSchool of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Nayung LeeInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Annachiara RosaThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Chloe RoustanThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Catherine F HoulihanAdvanced Pathogens Diagnostic Unit, Department of Clinical Virology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London W1T 4EU, UK; Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London WC1 6BT, UK.
Rogier W SandersAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ravindra K GuptaDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK.
Peter CherepanovThe Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Hans J StaussInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Eleni NastouliAdvanced Pathogens Diagnostic Unit, Department of Clinical Virology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London W1T 4EU, UK; The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK; Great Ormond Street Institute for Child Health, Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
SAFER Investigators
Katie J DooresSchool of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Marit J van GilsAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Laura E McCoyInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK. Electronic address: l.mccoy@ucl.ac.uk.
Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution · GBAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLKing's College London · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Structural studies of native-like SOSIP trimersP01AI110657 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MOORE, JOHN P · 2015 to 2024
$35.4M
Medical Research Council MC_PC_19082Medical Research Council MR/R008698/1Medical Research Council MR/V028448/1NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI110657Wellcome Trust FC001061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines show protective efficacy, which is most likely mediated by neutralizing antibodies recognizing the viral entry protein, spike. Because new SARS-CoV-2 variants are emerging rapidly, as exemplified by the B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 lineages, it is critical to understand whether antibody responses induced by infection with the original SARS-CoV-2 virus or current vaccines remain effective. In this study, we evaluate neutralization of a series of mutated spike pseudotypes based on divergence from SARS-CoV and then compare neutralization of the B.1.1.7 spike pseudotype and individual mutations. Spike-specific monoclonal antibody neutralization is reduced dramatically; in contrast, polyclonal antibodies from individuals infected in early 2020 remain active against most mutated spike pseudotypes, but potency is reduced in a minority of samples. This work highlights that changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike can alter neutralization sensitivity and underlines the need for effective real-time monitoring of emerging mutations and their effect on vaccine efficacy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHEK293 CellsHumansNeutralization TestsPoint MutationReceptors, VirusSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesReceptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2antibodiesB.1.1.7immune escapeneutralizationSARS-CoV-2serologyvariant

Identifiers

PMID33713594
PMCPMC7936541
OpenAlexW3135556657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.