Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33713579›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2021

Ex vivo model predicted in vivo efficacy of CFTR modulator therapy in a child with rare genotype.

Vito Terlizzi, Felice Amato, Chiara Castellani, Beatrice Ferrari, Luis J V Galietta, Giuseppe Castaldo, Giovanni Taccetti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07632768 (The Return of the Pancreas), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07632768 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Return of the Pancreas: Evaluating Impact of CFTR Modulators on Pancreatic Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled17ConditionsCystic Fibrosis (CF), Pancreatic Insufficiency, Pancreas Disease, Exocrine Pancreatic InsufficiencyArmsDiscontinuation of Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. iScience · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Patient-derived cell models for personalized medicine approaches in cystic fibrosis.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Q1291H-CFTR molecular dynamics simulations andFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Modulator Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis Patients withJournal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vito TerlizziCystic Fibrosis Regional Reference Center,, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Anna Meyer Children's University, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1106-4424
Felice AmatoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples Federico II.
Chiara CastellaniCystic Fibrosis Regional Reference Center,, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Anna Meyer Children's University, Florence, Italy.
Beatrice FerrariCystic Fibrosis Regional Reference Center,, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Anna Meyer Children's University, Florence, Italy.
Luis J V GaliettaTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM, Pozzuoli, Italy).
Giuseppe CastaldoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples Federico II.
Giovanni TaccettiCystic Fibrosis Regional Reference Center,, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Anna Meyer Children's University, Florence, Italy.
Meyer Children's Hospital · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITTelethon Institute Of Genetics And Medicine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew drugs that target the basic defect in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients may now be used in a large number of patients carrying responsive mutations. Nevertheless, further research is needed to extend the benefit of these treatments to patients with rare mutations that are still uncharacterized in vitro and that are not included in clinical trials. For this purpose, ex vivo models are necessary to preliminary assessing the effect of CFTR modulators in these cases.

methodWe report the clinical effectiveness of lumacaftor/ivacaftor therapy prescribed to a CF child with a rare genetic profile (p.Phe508del/p.Gly970Asp) after testing the drug on nasal epithelial cells. We observed a significant drop of the sweat chloride value, as of the lung clearance index. A longer follow-up period is needed to define the effects of therapy on pancreatic status, although an increase of the fecal elastase values was found.

conclusionDrug response obtained on nasal epithelial cells correlates with changes in vivo therapeutic endpoints and can be a predictor of clinical efficacy of novel drugs especially in pediatric patients.

Indexed as

GenotypeAminophenolsAminopyridinesBenzodioxolesCells, CulturedChild, PreschoolChloride Channel AgonistsChloridesCystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansMutation, MissenseNasal MucosaPancreatic ElastaseAminophenolsAminopyridinesBenzodioxolesCFTR protein, humanChloride Channel AgonistsChloridesCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorivacaftorlumacaftorPancreatic ElastaseQuinoloneschildrencystic fibrosislumacaftor/ivacaftornasal brushing

Identifiers

PMID33713579
PMCPMC8123755
OpenAlexW3137759853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.