Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33713489›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical periodontology2021

Comparative analyses of the soft tissue interfaces around teeth and implants: Insights from a pre-clinical implant model.

Xue Yuan, Xibo Pei, Jinlong Chen, Yuan Zhao, John B Brunski, Jill A Helms

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Immunomodulatory IL-23 receptor antagonist peptide nanocoatings for implant soft tissue healing.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Enamel Matrix Derivative Decreases Pyroptosis-Related Genes in Macrophages.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xue YuanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8063-9431
Xibo PeiState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jinlong ChenState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuan ZhaoDepartment of Cariology and Endodontology, School of Dentistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
John B BrunskiDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA.
Jill A HelmsDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0463-396X

Funding

Role of Wnt-responsive cells in oral mucosa homeostasis, injury, and malignancyK99DE028585 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI YUAN, XUE · 2019 to 2020
$206k
NIDCR NIH HHS K99 DE028585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the similarities and differences in barrier function of a peri-implant epithelium (PIE) versus a native junctional epithelium (JE). MATERIALS AND

methodsA mouse model was used wherein titanium implants were placed sub-occlusally in healed extraction sites. The PIE was examined at multiple timepoints after implant placement, to capture and understand the temporal nature of its assembly and homeostatic status. Mitotic activity, hemidesmosomal attachment apparatus, and inflammatory responses in the PIE were compared against a JE. Additionally, we evaluated whether the PIE developed a Wnt-responsive stem cell niche like a JE.

resultsThe PIE developed from oral epithelium (OE) that had, by the time of implant placement, lost all characteristics of a JE. Compared with a JE, an established PIE had more proliferating cells, exhibited lower expression of attachment proteins, and had significantly more inflammatory cells in the underlying connective tissue. Wnt-responsive cells in the OE contributed to an initial PIE, but Wnt-responsive cells and their descendants were lost as the PIE matured.

conclusionsAlthough histologically similar, the PIE lacked a Wnt-responsive stem cell niche and exhibited characteristics of a chronically inflamed tissue. Both features contributed to suboptimal barrier functions of the PIE compared with a native JE.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsToothAnimalsDental Implantation, EndosseousEpithelial AttachmentEpitheliumGingivaMiceTitaniumDental ImplantsTitaniumdental implantsgingivainflammationoral epitheliumWnt-responsive

Identifiers

PMID33713489
PMCPMC8085107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.