Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33713394›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2022

CCR2 contributes to host defense against Staphylococcus aureus orthopedic implant-associated infections in mice.

Yu Wang, Dustin Dikeman, Jeffrey Zhang, Nicole Ackerman, Sophia Kim, Martin P Alphonse, Roger V Ortines, Haiyun Liu, Daniel P Joyce, Carly A Dillen and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The osteoblast secretome inFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu WangDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4153-7360
Dustin DikemanDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jeffrey ZhangDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nicole AckermanDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sophia KimDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Martin P AlphonseDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3447-1284
Roger V OrtinesDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Haiyun LiuDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Daniel P JoyceDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Carly A DillenDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
John M ThompsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abigail A ThomasDivision of Bacterial Parasitic, and Allergenic Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Roger D PlautDivision of Bacterial Parasitic, and Allergenic Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Lloyd S MillerDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8332-2210
Nathan K ArcherDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8212-8985
Johns Hopkins University · USCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

IL-36 responses in Staphylococcus aureus driven skin inflammationR01AR073665 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARCHER, NATHAN K. · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
STAT3-mediated immunity to Staphylococcus aureus in skinR01AR069502 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARCHER, NATHAN K. · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NETWORK ON ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN STAPHTLOCOCCUS AN01AI095359 · NIAID · FOCUS/MRL, INC.-MRL PHARMACEUTICAL SRVS · PI SAHM, DANIEL F · 1999 to 2000
$495k
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI095359NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069502NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) is an important mediator of myeloid cell chemotaxis during inflammation and infection. Myeloid cells such as monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils contribute to host defense during orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAI), but whether CCR2-mediated chemotaxis is involved remains unclear. Therefore, a Staphylococcus aureus OIAI model was performed by surgically placing an orthopedic-grade titanium implant and inoculating a bioluminescent S. aureus strain in knee joints of wildtype (wt) and CCR2-deficient mice. In vivo bioluminescent signals significantly increased in CCR2-deficient mice compared with wt mice at later time points (Days 14-28), which was confirmed with ex vivo colony-forming unit enumeration. S. aureus γ-hemolysin utilizes CCR2 to induce host cell lysis. However, there were no differences in bacterial burden when the OIAI model was performed with a parental versus a mutant γ-hemolysin-deficient S. aureus strain, indicating that the protection was mediated by the host cell function of CCR2 rather than γ-hemolysin virulence. Although CCR2-deficient and wt mice had similar cellular infiltrates in the infected joint tissue, CCR2-deficient mice had reduced myeloid cells and γδ T cells in the draining lymph nodes. Taken together, CCR2 contributed to host defense at later time points during an OIAI by increasing immune cell infiltrates in the draining lymph nodes, which likely contained the infection and prevented invasive spread.

Indexed as

Staphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnimalsHemolysin ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutReceptors, CCR2Receptors, ChemokineCcr2 protein, mouseHemolysin ProteinsReceptors, CCR2Receptors, ChemokineCCR2cellular immunityhost defenseorthopedic infectionStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID33713394
PMCPMC8435538
OpenAlexW3135366541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.