Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33713368›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2022

Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study.

Denise Azar, Michael Murphy, Alana Fishman, Lauren Sewell, Megan Barnes, Amanda Proposch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Lung Cancer Screening Participation Among Indigenous Peoples Worldwide: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Opportunities.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Talking about health: Community ambassadors as a health promotion strategy to increase breast and bowel cancer screening in regional Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Denise AzarGippsland Primary Health Network, Traralgon, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7041-4706
Michael MurphyMichael Murphy Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alana FishmanMichael Murphy Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lauren SewellGippsland Primary Health Network, Traralgon, VIC, Australia.
Megan BarnesGippsland Primary Health Network, Traralgon, VIC, Australia.
Amanda ProposchGippsland Primary Health Network, Traralgon, VIC, Australia.

Funding

Department of Health and Human Services, State Government of Victoria
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedPopulation cancer screening rates are around 50% for the general population and even lower in rural areas. This study aimed to explore knowledge, attitudes, behaviours, motivators and barriers to breast, bowel and cervical screening participation in under-screened men and women.

methodsWe used a qualitative research design. Focus groups were segmented by age, sex and screening participation. Participants were under-screened in at least one of the cancer screening programs, with separate groups for each of the programs. The discussion guides were designed around the Health Belief Model and group discussions were coded using a thematic content analysis approach.

resultsFourteen focus groups were held with 80 participants. Key themes were that the concept of cancer screening was not well understood, a low priority for preventive health behaviours, issues relating to local general practitioners (GP) and screening was unpleasant, embarrassing and/or inconvenient. A key determinant of participation in cancer screening was exposure to prompts to action, and it was evident that participants often required multiple prompts before they took action.

conclusionsOpportunities that develop attitudes to health that place disease prevention as a high priority; improve understanding of the benefit of screening in terms of early detection and treatment; improve GP availability and the patient-practitioner relationship; and the development of messages for each of the screening programs should be further explored as factors that may influence rural population screening rates. SO WHAT?: Addressing health attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, health practitioner and test-related barriers and improving messaging may increase cancer screening participation in under-screened rural populations.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMass ScreeningQualitative ResearchRural Populationcancerhealth behavioursqualitative methodsrural and regional health

Identifiers

PMID33713368
PMCPMC9292328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.