Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33713248›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2021

Magnetic Hyperthermia as an adjuvant cancer therapy in combination with radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for recurrent/progressive glioblastoma: a systematic review.

Sakine Shirvalilou, Samideh Khoei, Azam Janati Esfahani, Mahboobeh Kamali, Milad Shirvaliloo, Roghayeh Sheervalilou, Parvin Mirzaghavami

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Application of nano-radiosensitizers in combination cancer therapy.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Neurosurgical Applications of Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy.Neurosurgery clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sakine ShirvalilouFinetech in Medicine Research Center, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box: 1449614525, Tehran, Iran. Sakine.shirvaliloo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3213-8824
Samideh KhoeiFinetech in Medicine Research Center, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box: 1449614525, Tehran, Iran. khoei.s@iums.ac.ir.
Azam Janati EsfahaniDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Mahboobeh KamaliOccupational Medicine Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Milad ShirvalilooStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Roghayeh SheervalilouPharmacology Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Parvin MirzaghavamiDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRQazvin University of Medical Sciences · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRZahedan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Iran University of Medical Sciences 13899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHyperthermia therapy (HT) is a recognized treatment modality, that can sensitize tumors to the effects of radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy by heating up tumor cells to 40-45 °C. The advantages of noninvasive inductive magnetic hyperthermia (MH) over RT or chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent/progressive glioma have been confirmed by several clinical trials. Thus, here we have conducted a systematic review to provide a concise, albeit brief, account of the currently available literature regarding this topic.

methodsFive databases, PubMed/Medline, Embace, Ovid, WOS, and Scopus, were investigated to identify clinical studies comparing overall survival (OS) following RT/chemotherapy versus RT/chemotherapy + MH.

resultsEleven articles were selected for this systematic review, including reports on 227 glioma patients who met the study inclusion criteria. The papers included in this review comprised nine pilot clinical trials, one non-randomized clinical trial, and one retrospective investigation. As the clinical trials suggested, MH improved OS in primary glioblastoma (GBM), however, in the case of recurrent glioblastoma, no significant change in OS was reported. All 11 studies ascertained that no major side effects were observed during MH therapy.

conclusionOur systematic review indicates that MH therapy as an adjuvant for RT could result in improved survival, compared to the therapeutic outcomes achieved with RT alone in GBM, especially by intratumoral injection of magnetic nanoparticles. However, heterogeneity in the methodology of the most well-known studies, and differences in the study design may significantly limit the extent to which conclusions can be drawn. Thus, further investigations are required to shed more light on the efficacy of MH therapy as an adjuvant treatment modality in GBM.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaHyperthermia, InducedGliomaHumansMagnetic PhenomenaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesClinical TrialGliomaMagnetic hyperthermiaOverall survivalSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID33713248
OpenAlexW3135005328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.