Trial reportAIDS and behavior2021
Acceptability of the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV-1 Prevention and Association with Adherence in a Phase III Trial.
Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01617096 (A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Safety and Effectiveness Trial of a Vaginal Matrix Ring Containing Dapivirine for the Prevention of HIV-1 Infection in Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Safety and Effectiveness Trial of a Vaginal Matrix Ring Containing Dapivirine for the Prevention of HIV-1 Infection in Women
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- HIV Prevention Product Acceptability and Preference Among Women in Sub-Saharan Africa to Inform Novel Biomedical Options in Development: A Systematic Review.AIDS and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Vaginal ring acceptability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vaginal ring experiences from around the world.Contraception · 2022Pooled it
- Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Intravaginal Ring Acceptability Scale Among US Women and Their Male Partners.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Trial
- Brief Report: Associations Between Gender and Solicited Adverse Events After Passive Infusion of VRC01 or Placebo in HVTN 704/HPTN 085.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025Trial
- Brief Report: HIV Drug Resistance Assessment Among Women Who Seroconverted During the MTN-025/HOPE Open-Label Extension Dapivirine Vaginal Ring Trial.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2024Trial
- Acceptability and Use of the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring and Daily Oral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) During Breastfeeding in South Africa, Malawi, Zimbabwe, and Uganda.AIDS and behavior · 2023Trial
- Correlates of Dapivirine Vaginal Ring Acceptance among Women Participating in an Open Label Extension Trial.AIDS and behavior · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Acceptability of an intravaginal ring for simultaneously preventing HIV infection and pregnancy: Qualitative findings of the Kisumu Combined Ring Study, 2019.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022Trial
- Patterns of Adherence to a Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV-1 Prevention Among South African Women in a Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2022Trial
- Estimated adherence to the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring and its associated factors among African women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Next Generation 3D Printed Multipurpose Intravaginal Ring For Sustained Co-Delivery of Antiretroviral Drugs and A Contraceptive Hormone.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- User and healthcare provider early experiences with the PrEP ring: a quantitative study on the introduction of a new PrEP method in Eswatini.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Observational
- PrEP choice in the real world: Results of a prospective cohort study describing uptake and use patterns of oral PrEP and the dapivirine vaginal ring among women in sub-Saharan Africa.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
- Updates on HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Latin America: Available Drugs and Implementation Status.Le infezioni in medicina · 2025Review
- A mixed-method study of feasibility and acceptability of the Dapivirine vaginal ring among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in selected Zimbabwean districts.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Acceptability of the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring and Daily Oral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) during Pregnancy in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe.AIDS and behavior · 2024Article
- An Open Letter on Advancing HIV prevention: Augmenting an ecosystem-based approach to understand prevention decision-making.Gates open research · 2024Article
- The role of economic evaluations in advancing HIV multipurpose prevention technologies in early-stage development.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2024Article
- Experience with Contraceptive Dosage Forms and Interest in Novel PrEP Technologies in Women.AIDS and behavior · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated the acceptability of the 25 mg dapivirine vaginal ring (DVR) as an HIV prevention intervention and its influence on DVR adherence in the MTN-020/ASPIRE phase III trial. Acceptability measures were captured using ACASI at month 3 and end of product use (median 24 months, IQR 15-30). Monthly returned rings were classified as nonadherent if dapivirine release rate was ≤ 0.9 mg/month. Associations between acceptability measures and nonadherence were estimated using Poisson regression models with robust standard errors. At month 3 (N = 2334), 88% reported DVR was comfortable, 80% were unaware of it during daily activities, and 74% never felt it during sex. At exit, 66% were 'very likely' to use DVR in the future. Acceptability was found to differ significantly by country across several measures including wearing the ring during sex, during menses, partner acceptability, impact on sexual pleasure and willingness to use the ring in the future. Risk of nonadherence at month 12 was elevated if DVR was felt during sex at month 3 (aRR 1.67, 95% CI 1.26, 2.23). Risk of nonadherence in the last year of study participation was elevated if, at exit, participants minded wearing during sex (aRR 2.08, 95% CI 1.52, 2.85), during menses (aRR 1.57, 95% CI 1.06, 2.32), reported a problematic change to the vaginal environment (aRR 1.57, 95% CI 1.12, 2.21), and were not "very likely" to use DVR in the future (aRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02, 1.68). DVR acceptability was overall high yet varied by country. Addressing perceived ring interference with sex, menses, or problematic changes to the vaginal environment in future interventions could help improve adherence, as could embracing sex-positive messaging related to ring use and increased pleasure.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01617096.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.