ArticleWorld journal of surgery2021
The Association Between Burn Unit Census and Operative Intervention in a Resource-Limited Setting.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe relationship between hospital volume and outcomes remains unclear in the delivery of burn care in resource-limited settings, where demand often exceeds capacity. We sought to characterize the association between burn patient volume and the use of operative intervention at a tertiary burn unit in Malawi.
methodsThis study examined patients admitted to Kamuzu Central Hospital located in Lilongwe, Malawi, over years 2011-2019. We described the association between the census at the time of admission and the use of operative intervention, as well as the time to operation. Patient census was defined as low (≤ 15 patients), medium (16-29 patients), and high (≥ 30 patients).
resultsA total of 2484 patients were included. The mean daily burn unit census was 22.5 patients (SD 6.6) and varied significantly by season. For the medium and high census, the adjusted risk ratio of undergoing surgery was 0.79 (95% CI 0.64, 0.97) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.49, 0.85), respectively, adjusted for flame burn, age, %TBSA, and delayed presentation. At a low admission census, the adjusted mean time to operation was 17.2 days (95% CI 14.4, 20.1) compared to 28.3 days (95% CI 25.4, 31.2) at a high census.
conclusionsIn a resource-limited setting, an increasing mean daily census significantly reduced the use of operative intervention and increased time to operation, potentially increasing burn-associated morbidity. In order to improve the quality of burn care in similar environments, improved resource allocation during busier seasons and targeted burn prevention efforts are imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33713166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.