ArticleGenetica2021
Genetic diversity of Oxytropis section Xerobia (Fabaceae) in one of the centres of speciation.
Article in Genetica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative chloroplast genome analyses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- PhytoKeys · 2025Article
- Tension zone trapped by exogenous cline: Analysis of a narrow hybrid zone between two parapatricEcology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2022Article
- Diversity and distribution ofBiodiversity data journal · 2022Article
- Study on the associations between liver damage and antituberculosis drug rifampicin and relative metabolic enzyme gene polymorphisms.Bioengineered · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Oxytropis caespitosa, O. grandiflora, O. eriocarpa, O. mixotriche, O. nitens, O. peschkovae and O. triphylla, section Xerobia subgenus Oxytropis, in one of the main speciation centres of the genus Oxytropis (Baikal Siberia and adjacent territories of Northeastern Mongolia) were studied based on sequence analysis of the psbA-trnH, trnL-trnF and trnS-trnG intergenic spacers of cpDNA, as well as the ITS nrDNA. Most populations are characterized by a high level of chloroplast genetic diversity (h varied from 0.327 to 1.000 and π from 0.0001 to 0.0090) due to the ancient origin for some species and to hybridization and polyploidy for others. 67 haplotypes were identified, of which six were shared. Phylogenetic relationships among species could not be satisfactorily resolved. Only the haplotypes of O. triphylla formed a group with rather high support. Probably, O. caespitosa, O. grandiflora, O. mixotriche and O. nitens constitute a single genetic complex. As regards the ITS nrDNA polymorphism, we detected only two ribotypes (RX1, RX2). Both were found in O. caespitosa, O. eriocarpa, O. mixotriche and O. peschkovae, while RX1 was present in O. nitens and O. triphylla, RX2 in O. grandiflora. The absence of diagnostic species-specific variants for the markers studied, together with the sharing of cpDNA haplotypes and nrDNA ribotypes between species, and the resulting polytomies on the phylogenetic trees, confirm the hypothesis on the hybrid origin of some of them. Obviously, the reproductive barriers within the sect. Xerobia are weak. However, morphological differences between the species of the sect. Xerobia are clearly pronounced, even when they grow in sympatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.