ArticleIrish journal of medical science2022
Improving ward level efficiency using a modified treatment room layout according to Lean methodologies.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Lean Implementation in Hospitals: Impact on Efficiency, Quality, Cost, and Satisfaction.International journal of health policy and management · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStandardised ward treatment rooms have the potential to improve efficiency in performing routine tasks. Our aim was to produce a standardised layout for commonly used equipment using a Lean approach.
methodsA standardised layout was devised for equipment used for venepuncture, intravenous cannulation (IVC), arterial blood gas sampling, urinary catheter insertion and nasogastric tube insertion. Stakeholder engagement was sought from house officers (HO), nursing staff, store staff and care attendants. HO were timed gathering equipment pre- and post-intervention, and a questionnaire was distributed. Feedback from all potential stakeholders contributed to the final design using repeat Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles.
resultsThe intervention was implemented across 20 inpatient wards, in 3 tertiary university teaching hospitals. The mean time taken to gather equipment for IVC significantly reduced, from 94.9 to 33.9 s (n = 166; p < 0.0001). Self-reported frustration among HO with the treatment room significantly decreased from 54.9 to 4.5% (p < 0.0001). There was a 62.3% reduction in the need for HO to ask other ward staff for help to locate equipment.
conclusionThis study demonstrates improved efficiency with a time saving of over 1 min for a very commonly performed ward-based task. Ward-based staff reported reduced frustration and less interruptions following the standardisation and optimisation of treatment room layouts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.