ReviewCurrent urology reports2021
Innovations in Urologic Surgical Training.
Review in Current urology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning Curve and Video-Based Technical Assessment of a Standardized Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Novice Robotic Surgeons.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Plastics Makes Perfect: A Collaborative, Cost-effective Approach to Multilevel Cadaveric Learning.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Overview of surgical training and assessment of surgical skills: a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Surgical gestures to evaluate apical dissection of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- A deployable curriculum with 3D printed skills trainers for altered airway management.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- A Multi-institution Study on the Association of Virtual Reality Skills with Continence Recovery after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.European urology focus · 2023Article
- Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Prostate Cancer.Current urology reports · 2023Review
- Validity of the Rezum Simulator for Trainees.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2023Article
- Surgical gestures as a method to quantify surgical performance and predict patient outcomes.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review aims to summarize innovations in urologic surgical training in the past 5 years. RECENT
findingsMany assessment tools have been developed to objectively evaluate surgical skills and provide structured feedback to urologic trainees. A variety of simulation modalities (i.e., virtual/augmented reality, dry-lab, animal, and cadaver) have been utilized to facilitate the acquisition of surgical skills outside the high-stakes operating room environment. Three-dimensional printing has been used to create high-fidelity, immersive dry-lab models at a reasonable cost. Non-technical skills such as teamwork and decision-making have gained more attention. Structured surgical video review has been shown to improve surgical skills not only for trainees but also for qualified surgeons. Research and development in urologic surgical training has been active in the past 5 years. Despite these advances, there is still an unfulfilled need for a standardized surgical training program covering both technical and non-technical skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.