Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33712937›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2021

Is It Possible to Predict Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery?-External Validation of Predictive Models.

Izabela A Karpińska, Jan Kulawik, Magdalena Pisarska-Adamczyk, Michał Wysocki, Michał Pędziwiatr, Piotr Major

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Weight Loss Prediction after Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2023
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Izabela A KarpińskaStudents' Scientific Group at 2nd Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Krakow, Poland.
Jan Kulawik2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Krakow, Poland.
Magdalena Pisarska-Adamczyk2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Krakow, Poland.
Michał WysockiDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital in Cracow, Krakow, Poland.
Michał Pędziwiatr2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr Major2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2 st., 30-688, Krakow, Poland. piotr.major@uj.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-6552-7979
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery is the most effective obesity treatment. Weight loss varies among patients, and not everyone achieves desired outcome. Identification of predictive factors for weight loss after bariatric surgery resulted in several prediction tools proposed. We aimed to validate the performance of available prediction models for weight reduction 1 year after surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe retrospective analysis included patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) who completed 1-year follow-up. Postoperative body mass index (BMI) predicted by 12 models was calculated for each patient. The correlation between predicted and observed BMI was assessed using linear regression. Accuracy was evaluated by squared Pearson's correlation coefficient (R

resultsOut of 760 patients enrolled, 509 (67.00%) were women with median age 42 years. Of patients, 65.92% underwent SG and 34.08% had RYGB. Median BMI decreased from 45.19 to 32.53kg/m

conclusionAlthough predicted BMI had reasonable correlation with observed values, none of evaluated models presented acceptable accuracy. All models tend to overestimate the outcome. Accurate tool for weight loss prediction should be developed to enhance patient's assessment.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BypassObesity, MorbidAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleGastrectomyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric surgeryExternal validationRisk prediction modelsWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID33712937
PMCPMC8175311
OpenAlexW3134547929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.