Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33712725›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Knee-related disability was largely influenced by cognitive factors and disturbed body perception in knee osteoarthritis.

Tomohiko Nishigami, So Tanaka, Akira Mibu, Ryota Imai, Benedict Martin Wand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Protection from Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Scoping Review.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential Effects of Indomethacin on Alleviating Osteoarthritis ProgressionJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomohiko NishigamiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and Welfare, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, 1-1 Gakuen-tyou, Mihara, Hiroshima, 723-0053, Japan. tomon@pu-hirosima.ac.jp.
So TanakaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Fukuoka Orthopaedic Hospital, 2-10-50 Yanagikawachi, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 815-0063, Japan.
Akira MibuDepartment of Physical Therapy, Konan Women's University, 6-2-23 Morikita-machi, Higashinada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 658-0001, Japan.
Ryota ImaiSchool of Rehabilitation, Osaka Kawasaki Rehabilitation University, 158 Mizuma, Kaizuka, Osaka, 597-0104, Japan.
Benedict Martin WandSchool of Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, 32 Mouat St, Fremantle, WA, 6160, Australia.
Fukuoka Hospital · JPKonan Women's University · JPOsaka Kawasaki Rehabilitation University · JPPrefectural University of Hiroshima · JPThe University of Notre Dame Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the existence of subgroups in a cohort of people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) based upon data from multiple pain-related variables and to profile identified clusters according to levels of pain intensity and knee-related disability. Three hundred and three people with knee OA were recruited. Latent profile analysis was used to confirm the optimal number of knee OA subgroups. Body mass index, radiographic knee OA severity, pain catastrophizing, pain related self-efficacy, and knee specific self-perception, were incorporated into the model. Cluster, demographic and clinical variables were compared between the resulting classes. Four distinct classes were identified. Cluster 1 (28.7%) represented early radiographic OA, and moderate pain intensity, disability and cognitive and perceptual dysfunction. Cluster 2 (18.8%) showed advanced radiographic OA, and moderate pain intensity, disability and cognitive and perceptual dysfunction. Cluster 3 (34.3%) represented various levels of radiographic OA, and the lowest pain intensity, disability and cognitive and perceptual dysfunction. Cluster 4 (18.1%) represented various levels of radiographic OA, the highest disability and cognitive and perceptual dysfunction. Considering cognitive factors and disturbed body perception may help to explain the phenomenon of the discrepancy between the knee-related disability and the severity of radiographic knee OA.

Indexed as

Body ImageDisability EvaluationAgedCognitionFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleOsteoarthritis, Knee

Identifiers

PMID33712725
PMCPMC7970993
OpenAlexW3133750316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.