Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33712717›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2021

Emerging therapies and management for neonatal encephalopathy-controversies and current approaches.

Ryan M McAdams, Megan W Berube

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan M McAdamsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. mcadams@pediatrics.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-1698
Megan W BerubeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3893-8665
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) continues to have a major impact on newborn survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes worldwide. In high-income settings, therapeutic hypothermia is the only established standard treatment for neonates with moderate-to-severe NE, with compelling evidence that cooling reduces mortality and major neurodevelopmental impairment in survivors. Despite therapeutic hypothermia, a significant proportion of cooled infants continue to suffer long-term disability from brain injury. Innovative therapies offer the possibility of further improving neurodevelopmental outcomes by working synergistically with therapeutic hypothermia to decrease hypoxia-ischemia-induced excitotoxicity, prevent progression to secondary energy failure, and in some cases, promote neuroregeneration in the developing neonatal brain. This review discusses emerging NE therapies currently under investigation, offers insight into controversies surrounding various approaches to clinical care during therapeutic hypothermia, and identifies ongoing knowledge deficits that hinder attainment of optimal outcomes for neonates with NE.

Indexed as

Hypothermia, InducedHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainInfant, Newborn, DiseasesHumansInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID33712717
OpenAlexW3133732085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.