ArticleScientific reports2021
Leveraging graph-based hierarchical medical entity embedding for healthcare applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Greater value add from electronic health records than polygenic risk scores for predicting myocardial infarction in machine learning.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- A scoping review of self-supervised representation learning for clinical decision making using EHR categorical data.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- DOME: Directional medical embedding vectors from Electronic Health Records.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- HealthGAT: Node Classifications in Electronic Health Records using Graph Attention Networks....IEEE...International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies. IEEE International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies · 2024Article
- Graph-based clinical recommender: Predicting specialists procedure orders using graph representation learning.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Heterogeneous graph construction and HinSAGE learning from electronic medical records.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automatic representation learning of key entities in electronic health record (EHR) data is a critical step for healthcare data mining that turns heterogeneous medical records into structured and actionable information. Here we propose ME2Vec, an algorithmic framework for learning continuous low-dimensional embedding vectors of the most common entities in EHR: medical services, doctors, and patients. ME2Vec features a hierarchical structure that encapsulates different node embedding schemes to cater for the unique characteristic of each medical entity. To embed medical services, we employ a biased-random-walk-based node embedding that leverages the irregular time intervals of medical services in EHR to embody their relative importance. To embed doctors and patients, we adhere to the principle "it's what you do that defines you" and derive their embeddings based on their interactions with other types of entities through graph neural network and proximity-preserving network embedding, respectively. Using real-world clinical data, we demonstrate the efficacy of ME2Vec over competitive baselines on diagnosis prediction, readmission prediction, as well as recommending doctors to patients based on their medical conditions. In addition, medical service embeddings pretrained using ME2Vec can substantially improve the performance of sequential models in predicting patients clinical outcomes. Overall, ME2Vec can serve as a general-purpose representation learning algorithm for EHR data and benefit various downstream tasks in terms of both performance and interpretability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.