Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33712653›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A focused very high energy electron beam for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

Kristoffer Svendsen, Diego Guénot, Jonas Björklund Svensson, Kristoffer Petersson, Anders Persson, Olle Lundh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Transformative Technology for FLASH Radiation Therapy.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of Ultra-High Dose-Rate (FLASH) Particle Therapy.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristoffer SvendsenDepartment of Physics, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 22100, Lund, Sweden. kristoffer.svendsen@fysik.lth.se.
Diego GuénotDepartment of Physics, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 22100, Lund, Sweden.
Jonas Björklund SvenssonDepartment of Physics, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 22100, Lund, Sweden.
Kristoffer PeterssonDepartment of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anders PerssonDepartment of Physics, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 22100, Lund, Sweden.
Olle LundhDepartment of Physics, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 22100, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY · DEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00001/9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An electron beam of very high energy (50-250 MeV) can potentially produce a more favourable radiotherapy dose distribution compared to a state-of-the-art photon based radiotherapy technique. To produce an electron beam of sufficiently high energy to allow for a long penetration depth (several cm), very large accelerating structures are needed when using conventional radio-frequency technology, which may not be possible due to economical or spatial constraints. In this paper, we show transport and focusing of laser wakefield accelerated electron beams with a maximum energy of 160 MeV using electromagnetic quadrupole magnets in a point-to-point imaging configuration, yielding a spatial uncertainty of less than 0.1 mm, a total charge variation below [Formula: see text] and a focal spot of [Formula: see text]. The electron beam was focused to control the depth dose distribution and to improve the dose conformality inside a phantom of cast acrylic slabs and radiochromic film. The phantom was irradiated from 36 different angles to obtain a dose distribution mimicking a stereotactic radiotherapy treatment, with a peak fractional dose of 2.72 Gy and a total maximum dose of 65 Gy. This was achieved with realistic constraints, including 23 cm of propagation through air before any dose deposition in the phantom.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationElectronsRadiosurgeryElectromagnetic PhenomenaParticle AcceleratorsPhantoms, ImagingRadiometry

Identifiers

PMID33712653
PMCPMC7971008
OpenAlexW3135883699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.