Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33712640›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A novel approach to the classification of terrestrial drainage networks based on deep learning and preliminary results on solar system bodies.

Carlo Donadio, Massimo Brescia, Alessia Riccardo, Giuseppe Angora, Michele Delli Veneri, Giuseppe Riccio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlo DonadioDepartment of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, University of Naples Federico II, 21 Via Vicinale Cupa Cintia, 80126, Napoli, Italy. carlo.donadio@unina.it.
Massimo BresciaINAF - Astronomical Observatory of Capodimonte, 16 Salita Moiariello, 80131, Napoli, Italy.
Alessia RiccardoDepartment of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, University of Naples Federico II, 21 Via Vicinale Cupa Cintia, 80126, Napoli, Italy.
Giuseppe AngoraDepartment of Physics and Earth Science, University of Ferrara, 1 Via Saragat, 44122, Ferrara, Italy.
Michele Delli VeneriDepartment of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 21 Via Claudio, 80125, Napoli, Italy.
Giuseppe RiccioINAF - Astronomical Observatory of Capodimonte, 16 Salita Moiariello, 80131, Napoli, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several approaches were proposed to describe the geomorphology of drainage networks and the abiotic/biotic factors determining their morphology. There is an intrinsic complexity of the explicit qualification of the morphological variations in response to various types of control factors and the difficulty of expressing the cause-effect links. Traditional methods of drainage network classification are based on the manual extraction of key characteristics, then applied as pattern recognition schemes. These approaches, however, have low predictive and uniform ability. We present a different approach, based on the data-driven supervised learning by images, extended also to extraterrestrial cases. With deep learning models, the extraction and classification phase is integrated within a more objective, analytical, and automatic framework. Despite the initial difficulties, due to the small number of training images available, and the similarity between the different shapes of the drainage samples, we obtained successful results, concluding that deep learning is a valid way for data exploration in geomorphology and related fields.

Identifiers

PMID33712640
PMCPMC7971004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.