ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2021
Computational analysis of fused co-expression networks for the identification of candidate cancer gene biomarkers.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging State-of-the-Art AI Algorithms in Personalized Oncology: From Transcriptomics to Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Identifying proteomic risk factors for overall, aggressive and early onset prostate cancer using Mendelian randomization and tumor spatial transcriptomics.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Multi-Omics Data Analysis Identifies Prognostic Biomarkers across Cancers.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Exploring the relationship between abnormally high expression ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in cancer target identification and drug discovery.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022Review
- Determination of Exosome Mitochondrial DNA as a Biomarker of Renal Cancer Aggressiveness.Cancers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexity of cancer has always been a huge issue in understanding the source of this disease. However, by appreciating its complexity, we can shed some light on crucial gene associations across and in specific cancer types. In this study, we develop a general framework to infer relevant gene biomarkers and their gene-to-gene associations using multiple gene co-expression networks for each cancer type. Specifically, we infer computationally and biologically interesting communities of genes from kidney renal clear cell carcinoma, liver hepatocellular carcinoma, and prostate adenocarcinoma data sets of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The gene communities are extracted through a data-driven pipeline and then evaluated through both functional analyses and literature findings. Furthermore, we provide a computational validation of their relevance for each cancer type by comparing the performance of normal/cancer classification for our identified gene sets and other gene signatures, including the typically-used differentially expressed genes. The hallmark of this study is its approach based on gene co-expression networks from different similarity measures: using a combination of multiple gene networks and then fusing normal and cancer networks for each cancer type, we can have better insights on the overall structure of the cancer-type-specific network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.