Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33712601›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Integrated cross-study datasets of genetic dependencies in cancer.

Clare Pacini, Joshua M Dempster, Isabella Boyle, Emanuel Gonçalves, Hanna Najgebauer, Emre Karakoc, Dieudonne van der Meer, Andrew Barthorpe, Howard Lightfoot, Patricia Jaaks and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 213 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
213citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

213 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PHLPP is neither a Phosphatase nor a Tumor Suppressor.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Interrogating the Mechanistic Link between Neighborhood Deprivation and Colorectal Cancer Risk through Transcriptomic Analysis of Normal Colorectal Biopsies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Clare PaciniWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7791-0940
Joshua M DempsterBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3634-9576
Isabella BoyleBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8138-1225
Emanuel GonçalvesWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9967-5205
Hanna NajgebauerWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Emre KarakocWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Dieudonne van der MeerWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Andrew BarthorpeWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Howard LightfootWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Patricia JaaksWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
James M McFarlandBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9978-480X
Mathew J GarnettWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2618-4237
Aviad TsherniakBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3797-1877
Francesco IorioWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. francesco.iorio@fht.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7063-8913

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 viability screens are increasingly performed at a genome-wide scale across large panels of cell lines to identify new therapeutic targets for precision cancer therapy. Integrating the datasets resulting from these studies is necessary to adequately represent the heterogeneity of human cancers and to assemble a comprehensive map of cancer genetic vulnerabilities. Here, we integrated the two largest public independent CRISPR-Cas9 screens performed to date (at the Broad and Sanger institutes) by assessing, comparing, and selecting methods for correcting biases due to heterogeneous single-guide RNA efficiency, gene-independent responses to CRISPR-Cas9 targeting originated from copy number alterations, and experimental batch effects. Our integrated datasets recapitulate findings from the individual datasets, provide greater statistical power to cancer- and subtype-specific analyses, unveil additional biomarkers of gene dependency, and improve the detection of common essential genes. We provide the largest integrated resources of CRISPR-Cas9 screens to date and the basis for harmonizing existing and future functional genetics datasets.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Copy Number VariationsGenes, EssentialGenomicsHumansNeoplasmsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID33712601
PMCPMC7955067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.