ArticleBJGP open2021
Does education of primary care professionals promote patient self-management and improve outcomes in chronic disease? An updated systematic review.
Article in BJGP open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- VISIONARA - developing a concept for decentralized competency-based learning in primary health care and its proposed evaluation.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Impact of a nurse-led educational intervention on knowledge and adherence to hemodialysis in Kiambu County, Kenya: a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Physical and mental health of behavioural health certified peer specialists in four US states.BMJ mental health · 2025Article
- Time Capsule Medicine: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study on Immersive Simulation for Chronic Disease Education in Medical Students.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Transforming healthcare: A pilot study to improve primary healthcare professionals' self-management support behaviour through blended learning.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Integrated self-management support provided by primary care nurses to persons with chronic diseases and common mental disorders: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Using co-design methods to develop new personalised support for people living with Long Covid: The 'LISTEN' intervention.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- 'Their role has a lot of purpose beyond being just being about exercises': a qualitative study of patients' experiences of physiotherapy following a mild traumatic brain injury.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Application of Interprofessional Education Model to University Pre-Licensure Health Students in the Management of Chronic Care Conditions in Zambia.Medical journal of Zambia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care has a vital role in supporting patient autonomy to enable people with long-term conditions to manage their own health and wellness. Evidence is needed on whether education and training of health professionals helps support patient self-management and improves outcomes. The authors' first systematic review included only two articles showing patient outcomes following health professional training for promoting patient self-management.
aimTo present an updated review undertaken from September 2013 to August 2018. DESIGN &
settingA systematic review was undertaken using the PRISMA guidelines, following the methodology of the first review and is outlined in the PROSPERO registered protocol.
methodSix databases were searched - Cochrane Library, PubMed, ERIC, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycINFO - in addition to web searches, hand searches, and bibliographies for articles published from 1 September 2013 to 31 August 2018.
resultsThe updated systematic review showed more evidence is now available with 18 articles in the 5-year period from the 4284 abstracts located. Twelve of these articles showed a difference between intervention and control groups. Of the 18 articles identified, 11 were assessed as having a low risk of bias and five overall were rated of weak quality. The educational interventions with health professionals spanned a range of techniques and modalities, and many incorporated multiple interventions including patient components. There may be a lack of adoption owing to several challenges, including that complex interventions may not be delivered as planned and are difficult to assess, and owing to patient engagement and the need for ongoing follow-up.
conclusionMore high-quality research is needed on what methods work best, for which patients, and for what clinical conditions in the primary care setting. The practical implications of training healthcare professionals require specific attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.