ReviewThe British journal of ophthalmology2022
Eye health indicators for universal health coverage: results of a global expert prioritisation process.
Review in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and Enablers to Seeking Eye Care Among the Adult Indian Population: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence and temporal trends of vision impairment over two decades among those aged 40 years and older in Nagar Kurnool district in Telangana, India.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Measuring the prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors and refractive error coverage among the young working age population in Kasganj district, Uttar Pradesh, India, using rapid assessment of refractive error methodology.International health · 2025Article
- Prioritizing Pediatric Eye Care in Saudi Arabia: A National Delphi Consensus Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring eye health professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices towards eye health promotion interventions: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Prevalence of visual impairment, uncorrected refractive errors and effective refractive error coverage in Koshi Province, Nepal - Rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Travel time to cataract surgical services in Kenya, Malawi and Rwanda: demonstrating a standardised indicator of physical access to cataract surgery.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- Vision impairment and blindness in individuals aged 60 years and older in Latin America and the Caribbean.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024Article
- The Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness survey: Review of the methodology and protocol for the seventh version (RAAB7).Wellcome open research · 2024Article
- Socioeconomic position and eye health outcomes: identifying inequality in rapid population-based surveys.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Effective cataract surgical coverage in adults aged 50 years and older: estimates from population-based surveys in 55 countries.The Lancet. Global health · 2022Article
- Trends in cataract surgical treatment within the Brazilian national public health system over a 20-year period: Implications for Universal Eye Health as a global public health goal.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Keeping an eye on eye care: monitoring progress towards effective coverage.The Lancet. Global health · 2021Review
- How can we improve the quality of cataract services for all? A global scoping review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Eye Health Integration in Southern and Eastern Africa: A Scoping Review.Middle East African journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn its recent
methodsWe reviewed the literature to create a long-list of indicators aligned to the conceptual framework for monitoring outlined in WHO's
resultsThe menu consists of 22 indicators, including 7 core indicators, that represent important concepts in eye health for 2020 and beyond, and are considered feasible, actionable, reliable and internationally comparable.
conclusionWe believe this list can inform the development of new national eye health monitoring frameworks, monitor progress on key challenges to eye health and be considered in broader UHC monitoring indices at national and international levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.