Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33712366›Full record

ArticleSeminars in cell & developmental biology2022

The why and how of sleep-dependent synaptic down-selection.

Chiara Cirelli, Giulio Tononi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The use ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Resting after learning or repeating the learned?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Thalamic involvement defines distinct slow-wave subtypes in NREM sleep.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chiara CirelliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 6001 Research Park Blvd, Madison, WI 53719, USA. Electronic address: ccirelli@wisc.edu.
Giulio TononiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 6001 Research Park Blvd, Madison, WI 53719, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Electron Microscopy Core CP01NS083514 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CIRELLI, CHIARA · 2014 to 2018
$7.7M
NIH Director's Pioneer Award (RMI)DP1OD000579 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI TONONI, GIULIO · 2005 to 2009
$3.6M
The cost of plasticity: from cells to systemsR01MH099231 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CIRELLI, CHIARA, TONONI, GIULIO · 2013 to 2017
$3.3M
Synapses and Sleep in Neurodevelopment: A Crucial Interaction at a Critical TimeR01MH091326 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CIRELLI, CHIARA, TONONI, GIULIO · 2010 to 2014
$3.2M
NIH HHS DP1 OD000579NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091326NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099231NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS083514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep requires that we disconnect from the environment, losing the ability to promptly respond to stimuli. There must be at least one essential function that justifies why we take this risk every day, and that function must depend on the brain being offline. We have proposed that this function is to renormalize synaptic weights after learning has led to a net increase in synaptic strength in many brain circuits. Without this renormalization, synaptic activity would become energetically too expensive and saturation would prevent new learning. There is converging evidence from molecular, electrophysiological, and ultrastructural experiments showing a net increase in synaptic strength after the major wake phase, and a net decline after sleep. The evidence also suggests that sleep-dependent renormalization is a smart process of synaptic down-selection, comprehensive and yet specific, which could explain the many beneficial effects of sleep on cognition. Recently, a key molecular mechanism that allows broad synaptic weakening during sleep was identified. Other mechanisms still being investigated should eventually explain how sleep can weaken most synapses but afford protection to some, including those directly activated by learning. That synaptic down-selection takes place during sleep is by now established; why it should take place during sleep has a plausible explanation; how it happens is still work in progress.

Indexed as

SleepSynapsesBrainElectrophysiological PhenomenaLearningCerebral cortexHippocampusNREM sleepREM sleep

Identifiers

PMID33712366
PMCPMC8426406
OpenAlexW3134039087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.