Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33711937›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Body mass index, performance on activities of daily living and cognition: analysis in two different populations.

Miguel Germán Borda, Luis Carlos Venegas-Sanabria, Elkin Garcia-Cifuentes, Ronald Camilo Gomez, Carlos Alberto Cano-Gutierrez, Diego Alejandro Tovar-Rios, Vera Aarsland, Khadija Khalifa, Alberto Jaramillo-Jimenez, Dag Aarsland and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Miguel Germán BordaCentre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, PB 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway. mmborda@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5832-0603
Luis Carlos Venegas-SanabriaSemillero de Neurociencias y Envejecimiento, Ageing Institute, Medical School, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Elkin Garcia-CifuentesSemillero de Neurociencias y Envejecimiento, Ageing Institute, Medical School, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ronald Camilo GomezSemillero de Neurociencias y Envejecimiento, Ageing Institute, Medical School, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Carlos Alberto Cano-GutierrezSemillero de Neurociencias y Envejecimiento, Ageing Institute, Medical School, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Diego Alejandro Tovar-RiosCentre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, PB 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Vera AarslandCentre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, PB 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Khadija KhalifaCentre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, PB 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Alberto Jaramillo-JimenezCentre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, PB 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Dag AarslandCentre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, PB 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Hogne SoennesynCentre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, PB 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana · COStavanger University Hospital · NOKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith this study, we aim to determine the associations of the different categories of the body mass index (BMI) with activities of daily living (ADL) and cognitive performance in two different populations living in the community; Colombian and South Korean older adults.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of two surveys separately; The Survey on Health, Well-Being, and Aging in Colombia (SABE) (n = 23,343) and the Korean Longitudinal Study of aging (KLoSA) (n = 4556). Participants older than 50 years were selected from rural and urban areas achieving a representative sample. Here we investigated the association between BMI categories with function using zero-inflated negative binomial regressions, and with cognition using logistic regression models.

resultsAfter adjustment, in Colombia, underweight was associated with an impaired score on the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and worse performance in the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Also, being overweight was associated with a better score on the MMSE and the IADL. For both outcomes education level significantly influenced the predictions. In South Korea, there were no significant associations for cognition, IADL, or basic activities of daily living (BADL).

conclusionsIn the Colombian population, underweight, was associated with reduced cognitive performance and daily functioning. Additionally, being overweight but not obese was associated with better cognition and daily functioning. In South Korea, there were no significant associations between BMI and cognition, IADL, or BADL.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCognitionAgedBody Mass IndexColombiaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesRepublic of Korea80 and over AgedBMICognitive impairmentDependencyObesity

Identifiers

PMID33711937
PMCPMC7953600
OpenAlexW3134156050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.