Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33711701›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology2021

Pharyngeal sampling for PCR-testing in the investigation of SARS-COV-2 vertical transmission in pregnancy.

Anastasia-E Konstantinidou, Panagiotis Skaltsounis, Makarios Eleftheriades, Panagiotis Antsaklis, Antonia Charitou, Fani Anatolitou, Athina Moutafi, Panagiotis Petropoulos, George Daskalakis, Hellenic Society of Perinatal Medicine

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anastasia-E Konstantinidou1rst Dept. of Pathology, Perinatal Pathology Unit, and Laboratory of Pathology, Aretaieion Hospital, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece. Electronic address: ankon@med.uoa.gr.
Panagiotis SkaltsounisNational Technical University of Athens and National Centre for Scientific Research "Demokritos", Athens, Greece.
Makarios Eleftheriades2nd Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis Antsaklis1rst Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Antonia CharitouNeonatal Unit, REA Maternity Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Fani AnatolitouNeonatal Unit, Aghia Sofia Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Athina MoutafiNeonatal Unit, Aghia Sofia Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis PetropoulosDept. Pediatric Surgery, REA Maternity Hospital, Athens, Greece.
George Daskalakis1rst Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Hellenic Society of Perinatal Medicine
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRIaso Children’s Hospital · GRLETO Maternity Hospital · GRNational Technical University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel COVID-19 global pandemic has raised, among many others, major concerns regarding the impact of infection during pregnancy. Current evidence suggests that vertical transmission from mother to baby, antenatally or intrapartum, does occur, but is uncommon. According to the published reports of infants born to COVID-19-affected mothers, as well as the anecdotal experience of current practices worldwide, it appears that investigations regarding the potential of SARS-COV-2 vertical transmission in pregnancy have so far been based, to a large extent, on PCR testing of neonatal pharyngeal swab samples. Given that the transplacental route of intrauterine transmission for SARS-COV-2 is less likely to immediately involve the upper respiratory tract of the newborn, contrary to what happens after birth, it would be advisable to include appropriate biological samples, such as cord blood, placenta, amniotic fluid and neonatal blood, along with the pharyngeal samples, in order to contribute significantly to such investigations. It is important to point out that negative PCR tests of neonatal pharyngeal samples do not exclude the possibility of intrauterine viral transmission, while positive pharyngeal swabs are more likely to reflect intrapartum or postpartum contaminants, rather than antenatal intrauterine transmission, in the absence of other criteria. Revision and enhancement of the so far prevailing practices appear important, in order to facilitate the development of good clinical practice for managing neonates and ensuring safety of families and healthcare providers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPolymerase Chain ReactionPregnancySARS-CoV-2Cord bloodCOVID-19Pharyngeal swabPregnancySARS-COV-2Vertical transmission

Identifiers

PMID33711701
PMCPMC7934651
OpenAlexW3133502471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.