Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33711123›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2021

Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: expertise-based randomized clinical trial of heavyweight or lightweight mesh.

M Rutegård, M Lindqvist, J Svensson, P Nordin, M M Haapamäki

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00451893 (An Expertise-based Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Heavy-weight and a Light-weight Mesh in the Operation of Inguinal Hernia), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00451893 nacompletednot on this map

An Expertise-based Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Heavy-weight and a Light-weight Mesh in the Operation of Inguinal Hernia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2006 to 2019Enrolled412ConditionsInguinal HerniaArmsLichtenstein operation with a heavy-weight mesh, Lichtenstein operation with a light-weight mesh
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M RutegårdDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
M LindqvistDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
J SvenssonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
P NordinDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Östersund Research Unit, Umeå University, Östersund, Sweden.
M M HaapamäkiDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a shortage of high-quality studies regarding choice of mesh in open anterior inguinal hernia repair in relation to long-term chronic pain. The authors hypothesized that heavyweight compared with lightweight mesh causes increased postoperative pain.

methodsAn RCT was undertaken between 2007 and 2009 at two sites in Sweden. Men aged 25 years or older with an inguinal hernia evaluated in the outpatient clinic were randomized in an unblinded fashion to heavyweight or lightweight mesh for open anterior inguinal hernia repair. Data on pain affecting daily activities, as measured by the Short-Form Inguinal Pain Questionnaire 9-12 years after surgery, were collected as the primary outcome. Differences between groups were evaluated by generalized odds and numbers needed to treat.

resultsA total of 412 patients were randomized; 363 were analysed with 320 questionnaires sent out. A total of 271 questionnaires (84.7 per cent) were returned; of these, 121 and 150 patients were in the heavyweight and lightweight mesh groups respectively. Pain affecting daily activities was more pronounced in patients randomized to heavyweight versus lightweight mesh (generalized odds 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 1.61). This translated into a number needed to treat of 7.06 (95 per cent c.i. 4.28 to 21.44). Two reoperations for recurrence were noted in the heavyweight mesh group, and one in the lightweight mesh group.

conclusionA large-pore lightweight mesh causes significantly less pain affecting daily activities a decade after open anterior inguinal hernia repair. Registration number: NCT00451893 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAgedChronic PainHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33711123
PMCPMC10364858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.