Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33711012›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2021

Natural selection in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in bats created a generalist virus and highly capable human pathogen.

Oscar A MacLean, Spyros Lytras, Steven Weaver, Joshua B Singer, Maciej F Boni, Philippe Lemey, Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond, David L Robertson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Oscar A MacLeanMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4919-4697
Spyros LytrasMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Steven WeaverTemple University, Institute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6931-7191
Joshua B SingerMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6989-475X
Maciej F BoniCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Philippe LemeyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sergei L Kosakovsky PondTemple University, Institute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4817-4029
David L RobertsonMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6338-0221
MRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GBTemple University · USPennsylvania State University · USRega Institute for Medical Research · BE

Funding

Turning big data analysis infrastructure for HIV researchR01AI134384 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI NEKRUTENKO, ANTON, POND, SERGEI L KOSAKOVSKY · 2017 to 2021
$4.2M
Modeling Epidemic Infectious Diseases Using Sequence AnalysisU01GM110749 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI POND, SERGEI L KOSAKOVSKY · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
European Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC_PC_19026Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_1201412NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400007CNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI134384NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM110749Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206298/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 206369/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 220977/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virus host shifts are generally associated with novel adaptations to exploit the cells of the new host species optimally. Surprisingly, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has apparently required little to no significant adaptation to humans since the start of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to October 2020. Here we assess the types of natural selection taking place in Sarbecoviruses in horseshoe bats versus the early SARS-CoV-2 evolution in humans. While there is moderate evidence of diversifying positive selection in SARS-CoV-2 in humans, it is limited to the early phase of the pandemic, and purifying selection is much weaker in SARS-CoV-2 than in related bat Sarbecoviruses. In contrast, our analysis detects evidence for significant positive episodic diversifying selection acting at the base of the bat virus lineage SARS-CoV-2 emerged from, accompanied by an adaptive depletion in CpG composition presumed to be linked to the action of antiviral mechanisms in these ancestral bat hosts. The closest bat virus to SARS-CoV-2, RmYN02 (sharing an ancestor about 1976), is a recombinant with a structure that includes differential CpG content in Spike; clear evidence of coinfection and evolution in bats without involvement of other species. While an undiscovered "facilitating" intermediate species cannot be discounted, collectively, our results support the progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 being capable of efficient human-human transmission as a consequence of its adaptive evolutionary history in bats, not humans, which created a relatively generalist virus.

Indexed as

AnimalsChiropteraCOVID-19Evolution, MolecularGenome, ViralHost SpecificityHumansPandemicsPhylogenyReceptors, VirusSARS-CoV-2Selection, GeneticViral ZoonosesReceptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID33711012
PMCPMC7990310
OpenAlexW3135415606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.