Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33710531›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2021

Improving glomerular filtration rate estimation by semi-supervised learning: a development and external validation study.

Ningshan Li, Hui Huang, Lv Linsheng, Hui Lu, Xun Liu

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ningshan Li *SJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics and Data Science, Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1916-2563
Hui Huang *Cardiovascular Department, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Lv LinshengOperation Room, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong, China.
Hui LuSJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics and Data Science, Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. huilu@sjtu.edu.cn.
Xun LiuClinical Data Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong, China. naturestyle@163.com.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 201104335National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFC0910500National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFC1315400National Natural Science Foundation of China 81070612National Natural Science Foundation of China 81370866National Natural Science Foundation of China 81873631SJTU-Yale Collaborative Research Seed Fund, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 17DZ22512000Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Clinical Research Program YHJH201806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial both in clinical practice and epidemiological survey. We incorporated semi-supervised learning technology to improve GFR estimation performance.

methodsAASK [African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension], CRIC [Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort] and DCCT [Diabetes Control and Complications Trial] studies were pooled together for model development, whereas MDRD [Modification of Diet in Renal Disease] and CRISP [Consortium for Radiological Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease] studies for model external validation. A total of seven variables (Serum creatinine, Age, Sex, Black race, Diabetes status, Hypertension and Body Mass Index) were included as independent variables, while the outcome variable GFR was measured as the urinary clearance of

resultsIn each independent variables combination, the semi-supervised models consistently achieved superior results in all three performance indicators compared with corresponding revised CKD-EPI equations in the external validation data set. Furthermore, compared with revised four-variable CKD-EPI equation, the seven-variable semi-supervised model performed less biased (mean of difference: 0.03 [- 0.28, 0.34] vs 1.53 [1.28, 1.85], P < 0.001), more precise (interquartile range of difference: 7.94 [7.37, 8.50] vs 8.28 [7.76, 8.83], P = 0.1) and accurate (P30: 88.9% [87.4%, 90.2%] vs 86.0% [84.4%, 87.4%], P < 0.001.

conclusionsThe superior performance of the semi-supervised models during head-to-head comparisons supported the hypothesis that semi-supervised learning technology could improve GFR estimation performance.

Indexed as

Glomerular Filtration RateSupervised Machine LearningAdultFemaleHumansKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedChronic kidney disease (CKD)Estimating equationGlomerular filtration rate (GFR)Semi-supervised learningSerum creatinine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.