ArticlePharmaceutical research2021
Machine Learning Attempts for Predicting Human Subcutaneous Bioavailability of Monoclonal Antibodies.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Comprehensive Review of the Revolutionary Potential of Blockchain in Safe, Secure, and Sustainable Pharmaceutical Operations.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Pooled it
- Tree-Based Methods to Predict Enzyme Inhibition.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Developing Subcutaneous Formulations for Irisin as a Potential Therapeutic.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Leveraging artificial intelligence in antibody-drug conjugate development: from target identification to clinical translation in oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Assisted Bithiophene Based Donor Acceptor Selection to Design New Fluoresent Dyes for Photovoltaic Applications.Journal of fluorescence · 2025Article
- Predicting Human Bioavailability of Subcutaneously Administered Monoclonal Antibodies Using Non-human Primate Linear Clearance and Antibody Isoelectric Point.The AAPS journal · 2023Article
- Predicting Human Bioavailability of Subcutaneously Administered Fusion Proteins and Monoclonal Antibodies Using Human Intravenous Clearance or Antibody Isoelectric Point.The AAPS journal · 2023Article
- Non-specificity as the sticky problem in therapeutic antibody development.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2022Review
- Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOne knowledge gap related to subcutaneous (SC) delivery is unpredictable and variable bioavailability. This study was aimed to develop machine learning methods to predict whether mAb's bioavailability was ≥70% or below, without completely knowing the mechanism and causality between inputs and outputs.
methodsA database of mAb SC products was built. The model training and validation were accomplished based on this database and a set of the inputs (product properties) were mapped to the output (bioavailability) using different machine learning algorithms. Dimensionality reduction was undertaken using principal component analysis (PCA).
resultsThe bioavailability of the mAb products being investigated varied from 35% to 90%. The tree-based methods, including random forest (RF), Adaptive Boost (AdaBoost), and decision tree (DT) presented the best predictability and generalization power on bioavailability classification. The models based on Multi-layer perceptron (MLP), Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GaussianNB), and k nearest neighbor (kNN) algorithms also provided acceptable prediction accuracy.
conclusionMachine learning could be a potential tool to predict mAb's bioavailability. Since all input features were acquired using theoretical calculations and predictions rather than experiments, the models may be particularly applicable to some early-stage research activities such as mAb molecule triage, design/optimization, mutant screening, molecule selection, and formulation design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33710513What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.