ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021
Drusen ooze: Predictor for progression of dry age-related macular degeneration.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term visual outcomes and development of retinal pigment epithelial and outer retinal atrophy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a comparison of conventional and novel classifications.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Interpreting Hyperreflective Foci in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Critical Review of Cell Origins, Evolving Terminology and Clinical Utility.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Tomographic phenotypes and conditional time to atrophic conversion in dry age-related macular degeneration among progressors: an interval-censored study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers Predicting Progression to Atrophy in Non-Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Assessment: Focus on Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Regulatory factors of Nrf2 in age-related macular degeneration pathogenesis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in individualized retinal disease management.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Prevention of Inflammation, Neovascularization, and Retinal Dysfunction by Kinin BJournal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Drusen drizzle.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Article
- Cytochrome P450 oxidase 2J inhibition suppresses choroidal neovascularization in mice.Metabolism: clinical and experimental · 2022Article
- NMDA Receptor Antagonists Degrade Lipofuscin via Autophagy in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Optical coherence tomography predictors of progression of non-exudative age-related macular degeneration to advanced atrophic and exudative disease.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022Article
- Subretinal Pigment Epithelium Illumination Combined With Focal Electroretinogram and Visual Acuity for Early Diagnosis and Prognosis of Non-Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration: New Insights for Personalized Medicine.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Their Metabolites Regulate Inflammation in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Journal of inflammation research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate natural history of drusen ooze and its role as a predictor for progression of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) longitudinally.
methodsMulti-centric retrospective observational case series of 72 eyes (72 patients) with dry AMD with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Drusen types were identified on volume scans on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and were characterized for occurrence of drusen ooze at baseline until last visit. Drusen ooze was defined as hyperreflective dots overlying a collapsing drusen or pseudodrusen, or hyperreflective RPE above drusen or isoreflective dots at the level of outer nuclear layer. The consequent incidence of incomplete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy (iRORA), complete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy (cRORA), and neovascular AMD (nAMD) were evaluated statistically.
resultsIn total, 72 eyes with a mean follow-up of 68.89 (± 25.57 months) were studied. At presentation, 11 eyes (15.3%) had a single drusen type, whereas 61 eyes (84.7%) had mixed drusen. Reticular pseudodrusen were most common (84.7%) followed by soft drusen (66.6%). Drusen ooze was seen in 47 eyes (65.2%) at presentation. The presence of drusen ooze at baseline (p < 0.01) and baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (p = 0.04) significantly correlated with development of iRORA and cRORA. In total, 14 eyes progressed from iRORA to cRORA over a mean follow up of 29.14 (± 24.33) months. Odds of progression to iRORA or cRORA were 20.3 times greater for eyes with drusen ooze at baseline (95% C.I., 4.4-94.2).
conclusionsIn dry AMD, drusen ooze is a useful sign for predicting progression to iRORA and cRORA over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.