Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33710431›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021

Prediction model for obstetric anal sphincter injury using machine learning.

Henry Hillel Chill, Joshua Guedalia, Michal Lipschuetz, Tzvika Shimonovitz, Ron Unger, David Shveiky, Gilad Karavani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Machine learning and disease prediction in obstetrics.Current research in physiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henry Hillel Chill *Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, PO Box 12000, Jerusalem, Ein Kerem, Israel. henchill@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2668-1612
Joshua Guedalia *The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Michal LipschuetzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Tzvika ShimonovitzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ron UngerThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
David ShveikyDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, PO Box 12000, Jerusalem, Ein Kerem, Israel.
Gilad KaravaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hadassah Medical Center · ILBar-Ilan University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisObstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a complication with substantial maternal morbidity. The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning model that would allow a personalized prediction algorithm for OASI, based on maternal and fetal variables collected at admission to labor. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary university hospital. Included were term deliveries (live, singleton, vertex). A comparison was made between women diagnosed with OASI and those without such injury. For formation of a machine learning-based model, a gradient boosting machine learning algorithm was implemented. Evaluation of the performance model was achieved using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsOur cohort comprised 98,463 deliveries, of which 323 (0.3%) were diagnosed with OASI. Applying a machine learning model to data recorded during admission to labor allowed for individualized risk assessment with an AUC of 0.756 (95% CI 0.732-0.780). According to this model, a lower number of previous births, fewer pregnancies, decreased maternal weight and advanced gestational week elevated the risk for OASI. With regard to parity, women with one previous delivery had approximately 1/3 of the risk for OASI compared to nulliparous women (OR = 0.3 (0.23-0.39), p < 0.001), and women with two previous deliveries had 1/3 of the risk compared to women with one previous delivery (OR = 0.35 (0.21-0.60), p < 0.001).

conclusionOur machine learning-based model stratified births to high or low risk for OASI, making it an applicable tool for personalized decision-making upon admission to labor.

Indexed as

Anal CanalObstetric Labor ComplicationsDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansMachine LearningPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsMachine learningObstetric anal sphincter injuryPerineal lacerationPrimiparity

Identifiers

PMID33710431
OpenAlexW3134530435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.