Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33710430›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2021

Pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI)-systematic review of measurement properties.

Guilherme Tavares de Arruda, Thaise Dos Santos Henrique, Janeisa Franck Virtuoso

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Responsiveness, Smallest Detectable Change, and Minimal Important Change of the Turkish Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 Following Pelvic Floor Muscle Training.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Relationship Involving Sexual Function, Distress Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, and Female Genital Self-Image.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Biomechanical integrity score of the female pelvic floor.International urogynecology journal · 2022
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guilherme Tavares de ArrudaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências das Reabilitação, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Rodovia Governador Jorge Lacerda, 3201, Jardim das Avenidas, SC-CEP: 88.906-072, Araranguá, Brazil. gui_tavares007@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5994-3247
Thaise Dos Santos HenriquePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências das Reabilitação, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Rodovia Governador Jorge Lacerda, 3201, Jardim das Avenidas, SC-CEP: 88.906-072, Araranguá, Brazil.
Janeisa Franck VirtuosoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências das Reabilitação, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Rodovia Governador Jorge Lacerda, 3201, Jardim das Avenidas, SC-CEP: 88.906-072, Araranguá, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 3.437.754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and PFDI-20 have been translated and validated into several languages ​​with different measurement property values ​​and are recommended by the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI) as grade A for assessing pelvic floor dysfunction. Thus, the aim of the current study was to investigate the measurement properties of the PFDI and PFDI-20.

methodsSystematic review conducted in August 2020 through a search performed in PubMed, SCOPUS, WoS, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for studies that evaluated the measurement properties of the PFDI and PFDI-20. The data were analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN).

resultsInitially, 2857 studies were found, and 7 studies on PFDI and 25 on PFDI-20 were analyzed. The PFDI presented high quality of evidence for hypothesis testing, moderate for test-retest reliability and responsiveness, and very low quality of evidence for content validity. The PFDI-20 presented high quality of evidence for criterion validity, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness, moderate quality for test-retest reliability and measurement errors, and very low quality of evidence for content validity. It was not possible to rate the quality of evidence of the internal consistency of the PFDI and PFDI-20. No studies assessed the cross-cultural validity.

conclusionOnly the hypothesis testing presented high quality of evidence for the PFDI. Criterion validity, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness presented a high quality of evidence for the PFDI-20. Due to the high degree of recommendation of the PFDI and PFDI-20 given by the ICI, further studies are needed to reevaluate all the measurement properties of these instruments.

Indexed as

Pelvic Floor DisordersUrinary IncontinenceHumansPelvic FloorReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesPatient-reported outcome measuresPelvic floor disordersValidation studyWomen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.