ReviewJournal of gastroenterology2021
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps.
Review in Journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Computer-aided diagnosis for colorectal polyp in comparison with endoscopists: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Pooled it
- Different endoscopic treatments for small colorectal polyps: A systematic review, pair-wise, and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤10mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of Saudi medicinePooled it
- Observational
- Endoscopic Assessment and Management of Colorectal Serrated Lesions: Current Comparative Practice, Challenges, and Future Directions.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Mixed lesions in premalignant colorectal polyps.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2026Article
- Polyp Tissue LRG1 Protein Levels andInternational journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model for pathological upgrading in colorectal polyps based on endoscopic forceps biopsy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting 3-year recurrence of adenomatous colorectal polyps after EMR: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Annual vs Biennial Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Japan: A Microsimulation Analysis.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Large colorectal lesions: Expanding the boundaries of endoscopic management.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Effects of endoscopic mucosal resection and argon plasma coagulation on postoperative recovery and complications in elderly colon polyp patients.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Postoperative recovery and bleeding risk after endoscopic snare cold resection in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Impact of complete colonoscopy after ischaemic colitis onset on colorectal neoplasm detection in patients without suspected coexistence of colorectal cancer on computed tomography: a retrospective analysis.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Polyp-Size: A Precise Endoscopic Dataset for AI-Driven Polyp Sizing.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Machine learning in colorectal polyp surveillance: A paradigm shift in post-endoscopic mucosal resection follow-up.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of three electrosurgical modes for endoscopic mucosal resection of 10- to 20-mm colorectal polyps: Randomized controlled trial.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Establishing a nomogram on the risk of pathological escalation of intestinal intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with colorectal intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE) published ''Daicho Polyp Shinryo Guideline 2014'' in Japanese and a part of this guideline was published in English as "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps" in the Journal of Gastroenterology in 2015. A revised version of the Japanese-language guideline was published in 2020, and here we introduce a part of the contents of revised version.
methodsThe guideline committee discussed and drew up a series of clinical questions (CQs). Recommendation statements for the CQs were limited to items with multiple therapeutic options. Items with established conclusions that had 100% agreement with previous guidelines (background questions) and items with no (or old) evidence that are topics for future research (future research questions: FRQs) were given descriptions only. To address the CQs and FRQs, PubMed, ICHUSHI, and other sources were searched for relevant articles published in English from 1983 to October 2018 and articles published in Japanese from 1983 to November 2018. The Japan Medical Library Association was also commissioned to search for relevant materials. Manual searches were performed for questions with insufficient online references.
resultsThe professional committee created 18 CQs and statements concerning the current concept and diagnosis/treatment of various colorectal polyps, including their epidemiology, screening, pathophysiology, definition and classification, diagnosis, management, practical treatment, complications, and surveillance after treatment, and other colorectal lesions (submucosal tumors, nonneoplastic polyps, polyposis, hereditary tumors, ulcerative colitis-associated tumors/carcinomas).
conclusionsAfter evaluation by the moderators, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps were proposed for 2020. This report addresses the therapeutic related CQs introduced when formulating these guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.