ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2021
Combining UBR5 and CD163
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the immune microenvironment in sinonasal intestinal type adenocarcinoma: new arguments for immunotherapy.Oncoimmunology · 2026Article
- Article
- Molecular understanding and clinical aspects of tumor-associated macrophages in the immunotherapy of renal cell carcinoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIdentification of reliable postoperative indicators for accurately evaluating prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients remains an important clinical issue. This study determined the prognostic value of UBR5 expression in ccRCC patients by combining with CD163
methodsThe expression of UBR5 was analyzed in ccRCC patients from TCGA databases. A total of 310 ccRCC patients were randomly divided into the training and validation cohorts at a 3:2 or 1:1 ratio, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) and statistical analyses were performed to examine the prognostic value of UBR5 and CD163
resultsUBR5 expression was commonly downregulated in human ccRCC specimens, which was associated with TNM stage, SSIGN, WHO/ISUP Grading and poor prognosis of ccRCC patients. In addition, UBR5 expression was negatively correlated with CD163 expression (a TAM marker) in ccRCC tissues, and combining expressions of UBR5 and CD163 better predicted worse overall survival and progression-free survival of ccRCC patients. Even after multivariable adjustment, UBR5, CD163, TNM stage and SSIGN appeared to be independent risk factors. By time-dependent c-index analysis, the integration of intratumoral UBR5 and CD163 achieved higher c-index value than UBR5, CD163, TNM stage or SSIGN alone in predicting ccRCC patients' prognosis. Moreover, the incorporation of both UBR5 and CD163 into the clinical indicators TNM stage or SSIGN exhibited highest c-index value.
conclusionsIntegrating intratumoral UBR5 and CD163
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.