ReviewDer Internist2021
[Asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism : Operation or observation?]
Review in Der Internist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn many cases primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) remains asymptomatic for years and is only detected by abnormalities in routine diagnostics. While symptomatic disease almost always requires surgical treatment, in symptom-free patients the question of whether and in what form treatment should be carried out is particularly important.
objectiveThe aim of this review is to summarize the current recommendations regarding the diagnostics and treatment of asymptomatic PHPT, taking the existing evidence into account. RESULTS AND
conclusionThe diagnostics of asymptomatic PHPT is the same as for symptomatic disease. The diagnosis is made in the presence of elevated parathyroid hormone and balanced vitamin D levels when a combination of hypercalcemia, hypophosphatemia and hypercalciuria is present. Borderline laboratory findings occur especially in asymptomatic PHPT and the differential diagnosis of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia must be considered. Once the diagnosis is made sonography, radiography or computed tomography (CT) is used to search for nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis. Regarding bone mineral density (BMD) measurements, in addition to routine measurements at the lumbar spine and femur, measurement at the distal radius is important as it is the most sensitive site for detecting osteoporosis in PHPT. An indication for parathyroidectomy is confirmed in the case of hypercalcemia > 1.0 mg/dl (>0.25 mmol/l) above the upper limit of normal, hypercalciuria > 400 mg/day (>10 mmol/day), renal insufficiency, proven osteoporosis or age < 50 years. If none of these criteria are fulfilled and surgery is not desired by the patient, annual laboratory check-ups and assessment of BMD every 1-2 years are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33710361What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.