Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33710348›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2021

Endometrial Cancer Risk in Women With Germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations: Multicenter Cohort Study.

Marthe M de Jonge, Cornelis D de Kroon, Denise J Jenner, Jan Oosting, Joanne A de Hullu, Marian J E Mourits, Encarna B Gómez Garcia, Margreet G E M Ausems, J Margriet Collée, Klaartje van Engelen and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Marthe M de JongeDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Cornelis D de KroonDepartment of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Denise J JennerDepartment of Epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jan OostingDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8894-1742
Joanne A de HulluDepartment of Gynaecology, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Marian J E MouritsDepartment of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2385-2639
Encarna B Gómez GarciaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Margreet G E M AusemsDepartment of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J Margriet ColléeDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Klaartje van EngelenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Irma van de BeekDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hebon Group
Vincent T H B M SmitDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Matti A RookusDepartment of Epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Geertruida H de BockDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Flora E van LeeuwenDepartment of Epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Tjalling BosseDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Olaf M DekkersDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1333-7580
Christi J van AsperenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC · NLMaastricht University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometrial cancer (EC) risk in BReast CAncer gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2) mutation carriers is uncertain; therefore, we assessed this in a large Dutch nationwide cohort study.

methodsWe selected 5980 BRCA1/2 (3788 BRCA1, 2151 gBRCA2, 41 both BRCA1/BRCA2) and 8451 non-BRCA1/2 mutation carriers from the Hereditary Breast and Ovarian cancer study, the Netherlands cohort. Follow-up started at the date of the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry coverage (January 1, 1989) or at the age of 25 years (whichever came last) and ended at date of EC diagnosis, last follow-up, or death (whichever came first). EC risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was compared with 1) the general population, estimating standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) based on Dutch population-based incidence rates; and 2) non-BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, using Cox-regression analyses, expressed as hazard ratio (HR). Statistical tests were 2-sided.

resultsFifty-eight BRCA1/2 and 33 non-BRCA1/2 mutation carriers developed EC over 119 296 and 160 841 person-years, respectively (SIR = 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.18 to 3.65; and HR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.53 to 3.69, respectively). gBRCA1 mutation carriers showed increased risks for EC overall (SIR = 3.51, 95% CI = 2.61 to 4.72; HR = 2.91, 95% CI = 1.83 to 4.66), serous-like EC (SIR = 12.64, 95% CI = 7.62 to 20.96; HR = 10.48, 95% CI = 2.95 to 37.20), endometrioid EC (SIR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.80 to 3.83; HR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.18 to 3.45), and TP53-mutated EC (HR = 15.71, 95% CI = 4.62 to 53.40). For BRCA2 mutation carriers, overall (SIR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.01 to 2.87) and serous-like EC risks (SIR = 5.11, 95% CI = 1.92 to 13.63) were increased compared with the general population. Absolute risks by 75 years remained low (overall EC = 3.0%; serous-like EC = 1.1%).

conclusionsBRCA1/2 mutation carriers have a two- to threefold increased risk for EC, with highest risk observed for the rare subgroups of serous-like and p53-abnormal EC in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsAdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCohort StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm CellsHeterozygoteHumansMutationBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33710348
PMCPMC8418438
OpenAlexW3133959868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.