Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33710327›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2021

Genome sequence and genetic diversity analysis of an under-domesticated orphan crop, white fonio (Digitaria exilis).

Xuewen Wang, Shiyu Chen, Xiao Ma, Anna E J Yssel, Srinivasa R Chaluvadi, Matthew S Johnson, Prakash Gangashetty, Falalou Hamidou, Moussa D Sanogo, Arthur Zwaenepoel and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Phylogenetic networks empower biodiversity research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Distribution of Pro-VirulentInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Development of genomic resources for Rhodes grass (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xuewen WangDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Shiyu ChenDepartment of Plant Sciences, Seed Biotechnology Center, University of California, 1 Shields Ave. Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Xiao MaBioinformatics & Systems Biology, VIB / Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Anna E J YsselCentre for Microbial Ecology and Genomics, Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.
Srinivasa R ChaluvadiDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Matthew S JohnsonInstitute of Plant Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics, University of Georgia, 111 Riverbend Rd, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Prakash GangashettyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), BP 12404, Niamey, Niger.
Falalou HamidouInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), BP 12404, Niamey, Niger.
Moussa D SanogoInstitut d'Economie Rurale, Ministere de l'Agriculture, Cinzana, BP 214, Ségou, Mali.
Arthur ZwaenepoelBioinformatics & Systems Biology, VIB / Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Jason WallaceDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, 3111 Carlton St Bldg, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Yves Van de PeerBioinformatics & Systems Biology, VIB / Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Jeffrey L BennetzenDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Allen Van DeynzeDepartment of Plant Sciences, Seed Biotechnology Center, University of California, 1 Shields Ave. Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigitaria exilis, white fonio, is a minor but vital crop of West Africa that is valued for its resilience in hot, dry, and low-fertility environments and for the exceptional quality of its grain for human nutrition. Its success is hindered, however, by a low degree of plant breeding and improvement.

findingsWe sequenced the fonio genome with long-read SMRT-cell technology, yielding a ∼761 Mb assembly in 3,329 contigs (N50, 1.73 Mb; L50, 126). The assembly approaches a high level of completion, with a BUSCO score of >99%. The fonio genome was found to be a tetraploid, with most of the genome retained as homoeologous duplications that differ overall by ∼4.3%, neglecting indels. The 2 genomes within fonio were found to have begun their independent divergence ∼3.1 million years ago. The repeat content (>49%) is fairly standard for a grass genome of this size, but the ratio of Gypsy to Copia long terminal repeat retrotransposons (∼6.7) was found to be exceptionally high. Several genes related to future improvement of the crop were identified including shattering, plant height, and grain size. Analysis of fonio population genetics, primarily in Mali, indicated that the crop has extensive genetic diversity that is largely partitioned across a north-south gradient coinciding with the Sahel and Sudan grassland domains.

conclusionsWe provide a high-quality assembly, annotation, and diversity analysis for a vital African crop. The availability of this information should empower future research into further domestication and improvement of fonio.

Indexed as

DigitariaPlant BreedingGenetic VariationGenome, PlantHumansPlant PreparationsExilisPlant Preparationsdomesticationgene amplificationgene lossmilletpolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID33710327
PMCPMC7953496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.